My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10416
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:24:59 AM
Creation date
8/3/2007 10:17:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Historical Perspectives on Colorado Drought
Date
12/1/2003
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
HDR
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historical Perspectives on Colorado Drought <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 21 was prepared by plotting the sum afthe basin decadal differences in the <br />number nf2-inch above and below annual precipitation events by dt.."'Cade for the <br />Platte, Colorado. Arkansas, and Rio Grande basins. This analysis portrays the <br />number of"extrcmc" events and their decadal changes. <br /> <br />The precipitation rich decades of the 191 Os and 19205 and the recent wet 19805 and <br />19905 arc easy to pick out. Conversely, the drought or dry periods orlhe "turn oflhe <br />century." 19305. and 1950's to 19705 can be looked at from a relative stance. NOle <br />that the two wet periods orlhe past millennium appear to provide less durational <br />impact than the entire extended dry period orlhe 19305 through the 19705. <br /> <br />The extended period oflhe dry 50s, 60s and 70s offers an amazing difference in <br />duration and intensity compared to the "spike" of the Dust Howl 1930s. Why'? Are <br />there differences from basin to basin or do the basins operate more in tandem then <br />separation'! Why'? Perhaps, the answer is in the meteorological causes of the dry and <br />wet periods. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'" <br />~ <br />" <br />- <br />~ <br />" <br />"- <br />'" <br />o <br />" <br />'" <br />.,; <br />" <br />~ <br />" <br />" <br />c <br />" <br />Vi -2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />2005 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />199~ <br /> <br />o..tka eMI., <br />, I <br />970 1975 1980 198~ 1990 <br />Blue periods indicate La Nina periods <br /> <br />1950 1955 1960 1965 <br />Red values Indicate EI Nino periods <br /> <br />1950-2003 (Wolter and Timn, 1998) <br /> <br />El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is the most important coupled ocean. <br />atmosphere phenomenon to cause global chmate variability on interannual time <br />scales. Wolter and Timn (1998) monitor ENSO by basing the Multivariate ENSO <br />Index (MEI) on the six main observed variables over the tropical Pacific. These six <br />variables are: sea-level pressure (P), zonal (U) and meridional (V) components of the <br />surface wind, sea surface temperature (5), surface air temperature (A), and total <br />cloudiness fraction of the sky (C). <br /> <br />Figure 22 shows the variation of this MEI index from 1950 to 2003. Note that the <br />red values above 0.5 indicate El Nino periods while the blue values of -0.5 or less <br />indicate La Nina periods. Note the regular cycles of the E1 Nino and La Nina. <br /> <br />Page 25 <br /> <br />paper <br /> <br />recycled conlent <br /> <br />HDR Engineering, Inc. <br />Printed on 30% posl-consumer <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />from <br /> <br />Annual variation of the MEI <br /> <br />Figure 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.