Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~l <br /> <br />--~. 'i <br /> <br />:,' J,"JI!I <br />\~~:j'~,i <br />~~ ,I <br /> <br />" <br />to <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />. I <br />Fi."ile P. .. . I <br />: 'MPtopu:s799suWpnary.doc <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />De ~fZ-T <br /> <br />July 2'1,1999 <br /> <br />I' <br />\t~ <br />J <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />S~IMARY COMl\'IENTS <br /> <br />I <br />The meeting :today was a thourough review and helps the non-federal interests <br />understand the PNIP study. <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />The group agreed that a single dissenting OpInIOn left the group Wlthout <br />consensus. On unr~solved issues, the members of the group were divided on their <br />concurrence with the :NWS approach. <br /> <br />The NWS agf;eed to reexamine its study in light of several specific issues raised <br />by the group, but the NWS does not expect the reexamination to have a significant impact <br />on the PMP estimate.: Some participants feel the reexamination could result in signi:tic:ant <br />changes to the PMP e'stimates. <br />1 <br /> <br />NWS PMP procedure is the only acceptable procedure for the Corps of Engineers. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />The CorpsINWS may request clarifying information from the authors of <br />unresolved issues. : <br /> <br />/i <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />, <br />. . Topics to 21 JIIly 1999 TecIurictd Meeting 9 <br />"'. ;. '." .... ~:~';~::.::-.!~' :-'". .". .. ....- ...... <br />.. .. '--'~--'-----'---_...~.__. . _. '---'-'___'__h . _._ . <br />. - ~ ....... - "'.....-.....Il-MT"..:-..-:..-;..;.;.." .:.', _'_ pO .~......... .'.;. .... '". _ _ <br />