My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10406
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:41:01 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 4:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Cherry Creek
Stream Name
Cherry Creek
Title
Agenda Item 11.f Sept. 27-29, 1999 Board Meeting - Report Regarding the Cherry Creek Dam Safety Study
Date
9/17/1999
Prepared For
CWCB Board Members
Prepared By
Larry Lang
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0- <br /> <br />FUe: P1.1Ptopics 799summary.doc <br /> <br />y~ <br /> <br />July 21, 1999 <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />31. Techniquesfrom two separate HyfJrometeorological Reports (HAtfR's) Le. HMR 52 <br />and HMR 55A are combined Without demonstrating consistency among the <br />assumptions and data bases used in the two documents. (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />No consensus is reached by the group. The NWS will examine a way to verify v' <br />this assumption. <br /> <br />32. The HMR 52 techniques were .developed for and intended for use ~ of the <br />orographic separation line (OSL) in 'Colorado (HMR 55A), Le. over the eastern plains <br />of Colorado and central plains of the US. The Cherry Creek Drainage lies almost <br />entirely ~ of the OSL HMR 55A _ states that additional study is required before <br />lIJ.l-lR 52 techniques as developed for non-orographic storms can be applied reliably to <br />the Cherry Creek Drainage. The discussion in the study does not provide this addition <br />study. (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />No consensus is reached by the group. The NWS will examine a way to verify this v <br />assumption <br /> <br />33" What is the stratification of rain versus snow for the events selected for the <br />antecedent study. What are the impacts of snow events (if any) on the study. (Hen:.) <br /> <br />NWS will examine and report back their findings. <br /> <br />34. Domain for storms used in Antecedent Storm Study is not the same domain for <br />storms used in H.MR 52. (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />The NWS will examine the issue and will respond to the concern. <br /> <br />35. The data from the Antecedent Storm Study is a spurious correlation of data. <br />(Schaffer via Tomlinson) <br /> <br />The NWS will examine the issue and will respond to the concem <br /> <br />36. Propose analyzing additional storms identified by the State Oimatologist to <br />compare with the within/with9Ut curves in HMR 52. <br /> <br />No consensus here. The NWS will examine a way to verify this assumption Ii <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />..-.....-...,. .. <br />" ..---"..-----.--. --.-- <br />- ," ....:-....~.:'*, -' .' <br /> <br />- - ., --..-. <br />..~-~ ".' -,~. -....."... <br /> <br />".' .' <br />. .............. .. <br /> <br />:;,,}~n~jI~i:= <br /> <br />.:,:.:, . .' ,Topics to 21 JIIly"1999 Tecluricol Meding <br />:.-:~~~::~~,::-:;;.~l~ih'=.,;7:<~ ,:k;~~~i~~;.,~'c: :: _:',' " <br /> <br />,8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.