My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12530
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12530
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:44 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 2:23:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8049
Description
RICDs - General Rulemaking
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/19/2001
Author
CWCB
Title
CWCB RICD Proposals-Technical Criteria-Policy Manual - Reviewed Drafts 2001-2003 - 11-19-01 through 11-21-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000579 <br /> <br />. The CWCB recommends an RICD flow rate in the range of approximately 50 cfs <br />to 350 cfs for each destination-oriented boating facility. The actual RICD flow <br />rate for a specific site and time of use will vary within this range depending on <br />water availability and other factors related to the recreational facility. The <br />CWCB suggests that an RICD water right should be granted for an intended use <br />and for a specific flow rate necessary to provide the intended reasonable <br />recreation experience during an intended period of time of use. The CWCB <br />suggests that an RICD flow rate may be unreasonable if it exceeds the 40th <br />percentile flow rate during the intended time period (flow rates can be evaluated <br />or estimated using available streamflow gage data or other acceptable means). <br />. Based on the futile call doctrine, a holder of an RICD should not be able to call <br />for the water right if such a call would provide insufficient flow for a reasonable <br />recreational experience. <br /> <br />The above-recommended range of flows for a destination-oriented RICD was arrived at <br />through the following means: <br /> <br />. A review of existing courses in Colorado and existing and planned "pay for- <br />courses worldwide. At "pay for" courses, the boaters are presumably having a <br />reasonable recreational experience because they are willing to pay for the <br />experience. (See the "Summary of Hydrologic Requirements in the Appendix). <br />. SUrveys of existing boating courses in Colorado Those surveys determined that <br />a reasonable recreation experience could be obtained at those courses within the <br />range of flow rates stated above. <br />· Recommendations and opinions from the CWCB's RICD expert, who has significant <br />experience with evaluation and design of boating courses locally and nationwide. <br />· Evaluations that the high end of the CWCB's recommended flow range (350 cfs) is <br />at or above the minimum flow rate utilized for a significant rumber of recognized <br />and international quality sites throughout the world (including the internationally <br />recognized boating course at La Seu d'Urgell, Spain, which operates with flows as <br />low as 210 cfs. See the appendix for details). <br /> <br />6. Hvdrcwlic EmineerirIQ Definition of Control <br />A recreational whitewater boating course must include manmade hydraulic stream <br />features that provide "control" of the entire RICD streamflow as required by <br />engineering principles. The hydraulic engineering definition of control is: A section <br />across the stream where a manmade structure causes the flow to pass through critical <br />depth when flow changes from subcritical to supercritical. The phenomenon gives rise <br />to what is known as a control section. Control of the entire flow should occur and be <br />effective within the river cross-section of interest for each RICD flow rate requested <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.