WSPC12529 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OOJ4!i5 IV. Whether during the construction of the RICn structures, the construction may cause material injury to the ISF or the natural environment that the ISF protects. v. TU and Denver Water recommend addine: a factor as follows: whether a proposed mCD water rie:ht would result in unnaturallv hie:h flows (or sie:nificant fluctuations in flow) that would damae:e the natural environmentl e. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RICn would promote-maximum utilization of the waters of the State. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: i. Whether there are any probable future upstream junior appropriations for direct diversion or storage;fThe Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sue:e:ests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.al 11. Whether there are any probable future changes, transfers, or exchanges of water rights from points of diversion downstream of the reach affected by the RICn to points upstream of or in the reach affected by the RICn;fThe Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sue:e:ests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.al 111. Whether existing federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected by the RICn. IV. Whether a reasonable means is to be utilized to use, divert, capture and control the water for a RICn so as to minimize its call upon the river and avoid waste; fTU sue:e:ests this rule is improperUPueblo West sue:e:ests addine: recirculation systems be added to this subfactorl v. Whether a reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as determined by levels of current use and/or estimates of future use; VI. Whether the application has appropriate limitations upon the time of day, days per month, or seasons during which the RICn would be exercised; fThe Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sue:e:ests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.al V11. The depth and flow rate ofthe proposed RICn; V111. With what frequency and duration the requested amounts of water for the RICn occur; and; f*:IX The ecoftomic effeet ofthe proposed RICn.rTU. Denver Water. the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District. Steamboat and Chaffee County consortium recommend keepine: this (economic effect) factor.l Whether the requested RICn flow rates exceed the average flow rate for each time period reQuested: fPueblo sue:e:ests the new rule e:oes beyond the CWCB's authoritvl Xl. Whether the reQuested RICn is for appropriate times of day and an appropriate season of use: fPueblo and the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sue:e:est this rule e:oes beyond the CWCB's authoritvl fSouthwestern sue:e:ests that this repeats Rule 7.e.vil X11. The amount of water claimed: X111. The effect on other uses of the amount of water claimed: and. fThe Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sue:e:ests this rule e:oes beyond the CWCB's authority 9