WSPC12529 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OJJ444 Conservancy District and the Colorado River Water Conservation District SU22est this rule is beyond the Board's authoritvl xv. Whether the course is located in a stream reach where it is at least the minimum recommended course length of 240m (790 ft.); and. [Pueblo SU22ests this rule 20es beyond the CWCB's authoritvl [Aurora sU22ests rewritin2 the rule this way: Whether the course is located in a stream reach where it--is THERE EXISTS at least the minimum recommended course length of 240m (790 ft.); and.l [ Steamboat and Chaffee County consortium SU22est this rule is outside of the CWCB's expertise and will lenlrthen the amount of time RICD hearin2s will takel [The Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District and the Colorado River Water Conservation District sU22est this rule is beyond the Board's authoritvl XVI. Whether the RICD has a minimum average slope of 0.5% or whether there is other information available demonstrating why the minimum average slope is not necessary. [TU opposed to Rules v-xvi because it these imply that structures must be build and/or desi2ned prior to obtainin2 a water ri2ht which is contrary to the concept of a conditional water ri2ht. TU also opposed to threshold values as needin2 variety dependin2 on the recreational opportunity bem2 sou2ht (slalom v. rodeo kayakin2 for examplel [Pueblo sU22ests this rule 20es beyond the CWCB's authorityl [ Steamboat and Chaffee County consortium sU22est this rule is outside of the CWCB's expertise and willlen2then the amount of time RICD hearin2s will takel [The Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sU22ests this rule is beyond the Board's authoritvl c. Whether there is access for recreational in-channel use. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: 1. The nature and extent of the access required for the activity for which a RICD is being sought;[Aurora SU22ests rewritin2 the rule this way: The nature and extent of the access required for the REASONABLE RECREATION EXPERIENCE activity for which a RICD is being soughtl 11. The ownership, leasehold, or other legal interest held by or available to the Applicant for purposes of obtaining access; and, 111. Any impediments to the Applicant obtaining access determined necessary for the intended useJAurora SU22ests strikin2 the word use and substitutin2 "Reasonable recreation experience"l d. Whether the exercise of the RICD would cause material injury to existing ISF water rights. The Board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: i. The nature and extent of the ISF in the proposed reach or any affected downstream reach; 11. The timing and duration of the RICD as such may relate to the specific use which is the basis for the ISF; 111. Whether the RICD would negatively impact the natural environment for which the ISF was decreed; and, 8