Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Part IV. <br /> <br />2004 Group Results <br /> <br />Pre-Audit anll\)st-Audit o.rnor ~r tiage of2004AG ~ssedas O/oEI <br /> <br />300~ <br /> <br />5% <br /> <br /> <br />25% <br /> <br />200~ <br /> <br />~ <br />~ 15% <br />= <br />~ <br />= <br />~ <br />~ <br />.. <br />~ <br /> <br />l00~ <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />?:Jf 1 0 JJ(f 1(;) ftf 1(;) .,7-(f 1(;) 0 1 ~ 0, 7-(f 1(;) ~o ~ (po ~ ?po ~ \ (jf 1(;) (jf 1 0 <br />b V?:Jf/~ V(Po/~ V~o/~ V'JP \0, ~(f/o, \A(f/o, \6(f/o, \'b(f/o, f~ <br /> <br />OAt Ef <br /> <br />iii Pre-Audit (2003) D Post-Audit (2005) <br /> <br />There was a statistically significant difference between the water use of participants <br />before and after the inspection, with pre-inspection usage being higher than post- <br />inspection usage. <br /> <br />Households that were watering above 1000/0 of ET <br /> <br />70% <br />60% <br /> <br />Pre-Audit 2004AG Distribution of Households wth Outdoor Water <br />Usage >100%Er <br /> <br />50% <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br /> <br />>. <br />~ 40% <br />QJ <br />= 30% <br />0'" <br />~ 20% <br />~ <br /> <br />10% <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />[1000/0, 200~ <br /> <br />[2000/0, 3000/0) <br /> <br />[3000/0, 400~ <br /> <br />0/0 Ef <br /> <br />II Pre-AuJit (2003) <br /> <br />Results: 10 of208 households <br /> <br />Post-Audit 2004AG Distribution of HOuseholds wth Outdoor Water <br />Usage >100oAtEr <br /> <br />700/0 <br />600/0 <br />500/0 <br />>. <br />~ 400/0 <br />QJ <br />= 300/0 <br />0'" <br />~ 200/0 <br />~ 100/0 <br /> <br />00/0 <br /> <br />r----- - <br />r----- - <br />f---- - <br /> <br />[1000/0, 200~ <br /> <br />[2000/0, 300~ <br /> <br />0/0 Ef <br /> <br />[300% 4000A;) <br />o Post-Auit (2005) <br /> <br />Results: 3 of 208 households <br /> <br />26 <br />