Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000099 <br /> <br />Parameter <br /> <br />Proposed Standard <br /> <br />Existing Standard <br /> <br />Fecal coliform <br />N03 <br />Phosphorus <br />Total organic carbon <br /> <br />2.2 dUllOO ml <br />5 mg/L <br />0.3.mgIL <br />2.0 mgIL <br /> <br />2000 cfu/lOOml <br />10 mgIL <br />none <br />none <br /> <br />The Water Quality Control Division proposal includes changes to the recreation <br />classification and pathogen standards. The Division's proposal reiterates that Colorado waters <br />shall be presumed to be Recreation Class 1 unless a use attainability analysis demonstrates that <br />there is not a reasonable potential for primary contact uses to occur within the next 20-year <br />period. Recreation Class 1 is broken into two subcategories: Class lA, existing primary contact, <br />and Class 1B, potential primary contact. It is proposed that these recreation classifications <br />contain the following pathogen standards: <br /> <br />Parameter <br /> <br />Class 1A <br /> <br />Class 1B <br /> <br />Class 2 <br /> <br />Fecal coliform <br />E. coli <br /> <br />200 dUl100ml <br />126 cfu/100ml <br /> <br />325 cfu/100ml <br />205 cfu/100ml <br /> <br />2000 cfu/lOOml <br />630 cfullOOml <br /> <br />The proposal indicates the Division's preference to shift from fecal coliform to E. coli, although <br />. a discharger may choose which parameter it prefers to be regulated by for the next few years. <br /> <br />The Water Quality Control Division proposal includes a new section on mixing zones <br />that may adversely affect a significant number of Colorado dis~hargers. In the past, the Division <br />assumed that 100 percent mixing took place at the point of discharge. The Division's proposal, <br />which was developed by a Mixing Zone work group, will in some cases make water quality- <br />based effluent limitations more restrictive. There are two primary components of the new <br />mixing zone provisions. First; new criteria are proposed to be used by the Division in <br />determining a "regulatory mixing zone," which is the allowable mixing zone for an individual <br />point source discharge. Second, the proposal includes criteria to be used by the Division in <br />applying the mixing zone provisions to determine the allowable dilution when developing a <br />discharge permit for aparticular point source. <br /> <br />The Division proposal revises the hardness-based metals standards to incorporate changes <br />made over the last few years by EP A in its metals criteria documents. Among other changes, the <br />zinc and cadmium values become less restrictive and the lead and copper values become more <br />restrictive. The proposal also incorporates total recoverable/dissolved conversion factors that <br />nominally reduce all of the hardness-based values. Another proposed change to the metals <br />standards is a proposal by Climax Molybdenum Company to change the aquatic life hardness- <br />based equation for manganese to incorporate toxicity data that was not available when the <br />original equation was previously adopted by the Commission. <br /> <br />Changes are proposed to the organic pollutant tables to conform these values to changes <br />made by EP A over the last few years. Also proposed are three sets of human health-based <br />standards that apply. depending on whether a water supply classification, a Class 1 aquatic life, or <br />a Class 2 with recurrent fishing, or both of these uses, is present. <br /> <br />2 <br />