Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r'il I v. _. - <br /> <br />000698 <br /> <br />RECEiVED <br />APR 1 3 2000 <br /> <br />APRlL 2000 <br /> <br />.~ l ,.....~ <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS <br /> <br />Colorado W..,..,.. <br />c: .1S'.:!""."". .. . -.. <br />Colorado Water Congress . 1"580 Logan Street. Suite 400 .' Denver. Colorado 80203... . Phone: (303) 837-0812 <br /> <br />Editor: Jerry Raisch, Vranesh and Raisch, LLP, P.O. Box 871, Boulder, Colorado 80306-0871 <br /> <br />Newsletter Concerning Colorado Basic Standards for Surface Waters <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Quality Control Commission will hold two significant water quality <br />standards hearings in 2000. The first hearing, which is on the Basic Standards for Surface <br />Waters 5 CCR 1002-31, will be held on July 10 and 11, 2000. The subject of the second hearing, <br />which will be held in November, is the proposed revisions to the classifications and numeric <br />standards for the South Platte River Basin 5 CCR 1002-38. This newsletter summarizes the <br />proposed changes to the Basic Standards for Surface Waters. <br /> <br />The Basic Standards provide the framework for the establishment of site-specific use <br />classifications and water quality standards in Colorado. As such, these regulations are one of the <br />cornerstones of the Colorado water quality control program. Although these regulations have <br />been revised numerous times, the changes proposed this year are the most comprehensive <br />revisions since the adoption of the Basic Standards twenty years ago. The proposal, which will <br />be published on April lOin the Colorado Register, consists of four exhibits. The first is the <br />Water Quality Control Division proposal. This proposal was. developed over the last nine <br />months by the Water Quality Standards Work Group of the Wa~er Quality Forum. The second <br />exhibit is a proposal by Glimax Molybdenum Company. The third is a proposal by Farmers <br />Reservoir and Irrigation Company (FRICD) and the fourth is a proposal by the City of Thornton. <br />Rather than discuss the various changes in serial order, this summary attempts to discuss the <br />changes in order of potential impact to both municipal and industrial dischargers in Colorado. <br /> <br />FRICD has proposed. the following new standards to protect water segments that are <br />classified for agriculture: <br /> <br />Parameter <br /> <br />Existing Standard <br /> <br />Proposed Standard <br /> <br />Fecal coliform <br /> <br />2.2 CFUIlOO ml <br /> <br />Nitrate <br />Phosphorus <br /> <br />5 mgIL <br />0.6 mgIL <br /> <br />No current standard. However, Recreation Class <br />1 =200 and Recreation Class 2=2000 cfu/l00 ml. <br />Current standard= 1 00 mgIL. <br />None <br /> <br />In the alternative to the above, FRICD proposes that the Commission adopt a statement that the <br />criteria listed in Tables I, II and III of the Basic Standards shall not be deemed protective of any <br />site-specific use until the use and related standards are adopted by the Commission in a site- <br />specific hearing. In effect, this alternative changes the Commission's existing policy that the <br />criteria listed in Tables I, II and III are generally protective of classified uses. <br /> <br />Thornton's proposal is similar to FRICO's, although its focus is on protection of water <br />segments that are classified as drinking water and consist largely of treated wastewater, such .as <br />the segments of the South Platte River that run through and below the Denver metropolitan <br />region. Thornton's proposal is as follows: <br />