My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12533
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12533
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:32 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 11:21:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2000
Author
Robert Jerome Glennon - Peter W Culp
Title
The Last Green Lagoon - How and Why the Bush Administration Should Save the Colorado River Delta - Excerpted from Ecology Law Quarterly - Volume 28-Number 4 - 01-01-02
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001&JO <br /> <br />956 <br /> <br />ECOLOGY lAW QUARTERLY <br /> <br />[Vol. 28:903 <br /> <br />practically no storage capacity because it was designed as a <br />diversion dam, not as a storage reservoir.323 Instead, Mexico <br />relies on U.S. reservoirs to provide the storage and timed <br />releases of its treaty water.324 As a result, Mexico can only divert <br />a small quantity of any excess flows that cross the border at any <br />given time. and can only divert them if they are timed correctly. <br />The water that reaches the Delta via the mainstream channel is <br />typically spring floodwater - water that Mexico cannot store, <br />cannot control, and cannot use because it does not arrive during <br />the prime irrigation season. The Surplus. Criteria will. tend to <br />reduce the frequency and volume of these spring flood flows (by <br />storing them in reservoii"s upstream); thus, the Surplus Criteria <br />reduce the only form of "excess flow" likely to reach the Delta. <br />BOR also argued that it lacks the discretion to deliver <br />additional water to Mexico for purposes of protecting the Delta. 325 <br />However, it seems only fair to point out that BOR has been <br />delivering "additional" water to Mexico for many years - indeed, <br />the only reason the Delta has received any water in recent years <br />is because BOR has released, and Mexico has failed to divert, <br />water from BOR reservoirs. Under NEPA, BOR must consider all <br />environmental effects of its proposed action in its EIS, and <br />"rigorously explore and objectively evaluate all reasonable <br />alternatives" to its proposed actions, including "reasonable <br />alternatives not within the Jurisdiction of. the lead agency. "326 <br />Similarly, BOR must "include appropriate mitigation measures <br />not already included in the.proposed action or altematives."327 <br />By BOR's own admission, changing the operations of its <br />reservoir system. will impact. the frequency and volume of flows to <br />the Delta.328 The fact that Mexico's allocation of excess flows is <br />beyond BOR's direct control is absolutely irrelevant to BOR's <br />proper consideration of the impacts of its action on the Delta and <br />its consideration of reasonable mitigation measures to prevent <br />these impacts. While the Final EIS contains a very nice <br /> <br />323. Diversion dams - like Imperial Dam and Morelos Dam - are constructed <br />primarily for the purpose of diverting water from a stream into an aqueduct 9rcanal; <br />typically, they are smaller,.low dams that have little or no capacity in their reservoirs. <br />By contrast, storage dams' - like Hoover Dam and Glen Canyon Dam - tend to be <br />large, high dams with substantial reservoir capacities. <br />324. See discussion of the process of Mexico"U.S. river operations on the IBWC's <br />website, available at http://www.ibwc.state.gov/wad/body_colorado_river.htm; see <br />also FINAL EIS, supra note 71, at 1-19, Table 1-2. <br />325. See FINAL EIS, supra note 71, at 3.16-1. <br />326. 40 C.F.R. !j 1502.14 (2001). <br />327. Id. <br />328. See FINAL EIS, supra note 71. at 3.16-20 and Attachment N. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.