Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In order to facilitate the process of developing a charter and bylaws , CSU ’s Colorado Institute of <br />Public Policy and CDR Associates worked together to develop ideas for three documents: 1) <br />ground rules or discussion guidelines (for use in deliberating over the charter and bylaws); 2) a <br />draft charter; and 3) draft bylaws. Moore stressed that these documents were drafts and offered <br />merely as a starting point for discussions. He noted that committee could cho o se whether to start <br />with the draft text s and modify them , or draft new documents from scratch. Tate walked <br />committee members through the discussion guidelines, and Lyn Kathlene (Director of the <br />Colorado Institute for Public Policy, reviewed the contents of the charter and bylaws. <br /> <br />Moore outlined suggested a process for committee members, in consultation with their Basin <br />Roundtables or other constituents, to review and consider the propo sed documents as the basis <br />for future discussion s . He asked committee members to identify for each section of each <br />document: <br /> <br /> <br />1. Where do you agree with the document as written? ( Find those areas and figure out a <br />way to mark them. ) <br /> <br />2. Where could you agree wit h what’s written if there was a minor modification? ( Identify <br />your proposed modification .) <br /> <br />3. Flag where you would need more information or further discussion before you could <br />agree on a particular point. (Identify what information you need or is desirable.) <br /> <br />4. Where do you disagree with what is written, why, and what interest do you have that is <br />not being met . (Identify changes that you would like to see included in final documents, <br />and explain why these changes are desirable/important.) <br /> <br />In addition to the doc uments described above, a summary of individual interviews conducted by <br />Reagan Wascam and his team from CSU will be e - mailed to all committee members. Issues <br />suggested for the focus of the committee will be compiled with those identified at this meeting, <br />for use in future deliberations of the committee. <br /> <br />There was an additional request from committee members to develop a reporting format for <br />Basin Roundtables to use so that IBCC could be appraise d and kept up to date regarding the <br />status and progress of in dividual roundtables in addressing their water issues. Ray Wright will <br />work with Eric Hecox to develop the reporting format. <br /> <br />All documents will be posted on the Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water for the <br />st <br />21 Century website . IBCC members were asked to solicit comments from their roundtables on <br />the working documents prior to the next committee meeting. Comments from at large IBCC <br />members can also be reported at the next meeting. The DNR website will provide a way for <br />members of the public to send comments on the documents to the committee. <br /> <br />Discussion of Proposed Focus and Date for Next Meeting <br /> <br />At the next meeting, t he committee agreed to begin the session with approval of discussion <br />guidelines , and then have a focused dialogue on several foundation al issues identified at its first <br />meeting: 1) What is the projected role of the committee , both mandated by legislation and other <br />