My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Eric H Feedback - CRWaterAvailabilityScopeDraf
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
Eric H Feedback - CRWaterAvailabilityScopeDraf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:01:08 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
Water Availability Study of Colorado River and Tributaries
Date
6/25/2007
IBCC - Doc Type
Needs Assessment & Technical Support
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Perform/Summarize Literature Review of Previous Studies/l1westigations - A <br />review will be performed of recent studies and investigations related to general <br />water supply ilwestigations of Colorado River tributaries ~ncluding fromL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ - <br />a. General <br />i. SWSI <br />ii. Tree Ring Analysis (i.e. Harding) <br />iii. CDSS Documentation of StateMod subbasin models. <br />b. Colorado River Compact <br />i. CWCB Investigations (including 1995 anlaysis of water available <br />to Colorado under Compact). <br />11. Tipton and Kalmbach <br />111. SCS Basin Studies <br />IV. USBR Basinwide Planning Reports <br />v. Upper Colorado River Commission Colorado River Compact <br />Analyses <br />Yl. Eric Kulm Analysis <br />V11. Colorado River and Upper Colorado River Compacts and Mexican <br />Treaty <br />V111. Coordinated Long-Range Operating Criteria and Interim Surplus <br />Guidelines. <br /> <br />3. Prepare a Glossarv of Terms relevant to the Phase I Study. Tlus glossary would <br />facilitate communications with members of the Roundtables and others involved <br />in the study. This glossary would include terms such as natural flow. depletions, <br />subbasin definition. etc. <br /> <br />4. !validation of Current CWCB Modelsl ~,jt!l}~.Qlll!dy!~I~ !l!~l!l~':l~:.. J~o_ ~1~il~t'!t~ ~_ <br />an understanding and acceptance of current water allocation modeling of <br />Colorado River tributaries by the State. the following activities would be <br />performed: <br />a. CWCB will prepare a brief summary (i.e. 10 pages) of the primary <br />operating criteria. results and calibration for the State modeling <br />(StateMod) of the current water supply/demand on each Colorado River <br />Subbasin. These summaries will also include a description of further <br />enhancements (i.e. inclusion of high altitude crop coefficients) proposed <br />for the study. Summaries will be prepared for the San Juan. GUllluson, <br />Colorado River mainstem. White and Yampa subbasins. <br />b. These summaries will be distributed (along with references to much more <br />detailed documentation on State web site) to basin roundtable members for <br />the discussionlYalidation of the State models. Each Roundtable Member <br />will be requested to review (witlun a three week period) the summary (and <br />extended documentation of the model if appropriate) for reasonable <br />operation of the current hydrologic base/demands and offer <br />suggestions/comments as appropriate. <br />c. Review Roundtable member suggestions/comments and prepare responses <br />to each suggestion/comment of the Roundtable members. Distribute the <br /> <br />Colorado River Water A \'ailability Study Scope <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />June 25. 2007 Draft <br /> <br />Comment: The National Academy of <br />Sciences did a report in Febmary, 2007 <br />"Colorado River Basin \Vater <br />t.:Ianagernent: Evaluating and Adjusting <br />to Hydroclimatic Variability." <br /> <br />- Comment: In addition to the <br />roundtable members, \vater <br />commissioners \vauld be very valuable in <br />this validation. Can \ve provide time <br />and/or resources for DWR to help with <br />tile feedback tram the roundtable <br />members? The Division Engineers are <br />liaisons to each roundtable and could be <br />helpful in explaining, managing the <br />feedback, and validating the models. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.