My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-14 Senate Committee
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
4-14 Senate Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:51 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
4-14 Senate Committee
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4-14 Senate Committee <br />Interviewer, Interviewee <br /> <br />Page 30 of 37 <br /> <br />Chairman: To where? <br /> <br />Sella tor Isgar: To the committee of the whole. Oh I guess- <br /> <br />Chairman: Senator Isgar, the latest fiscal note that I have in my bill folder <br />shows $247,000 point five FTV impact cash fi.Jl1d, let's see if it' s <br />exempt or not, so I think the proper motion is to appropriation. <br />Does it go to appropriation in the House of Representatives? <br /> <br />Senator Isgar: I believe so. <br /> <br />Chairman: And it is actually dual side. No it is not dual side, but it did get <br />appropriations in the House, so the proper motion to that is that <br />Senate Appropriations Committee. <br /> <br />Sellator Isgar: I stand corrected. I would move House Bill 1177 to the committee <br />on appropriations. <br /> <br />Chairmall: That motion is in order Senator Isgar do you have an amendment? <br /> <br />Senator Isgar: Yeah the first amendment, I would move L- <br />022 Frank McNulty explained this was a line that inadvertently got <br />omitted when the bill was re-drafted or when we went to the I <br />believe to the . It just got dropped a line so this <br />is just adding that back, its just a technical correction. <br /> <br />Chairman: Any discussion ofL-022? Seeing none. Is there an objection to L- <br />022? Seeing none, that amendment is adopted unanimously. <br />Senator Isgar. <br /> <br />Senator Isgar: Yes, I'd also like to move L-025, this the amendments that Frank <br />walked us through in the pre-amended version. <br /> <br />Chairman: Is there any discussion ofL-025? Senator Entz. <br /> <br />Senator Elltz: When do I get the amendments Mr. Chairman? We can adopt it or- <br /> <br />Chairman: Yeah we can adopt it, or if you wanted to change anything L-025 <br />we would adopt it and then you can amend it. <br /> <br />Senator Entz: OK. <br /> <br />Chairman: Is there fi.lrther discussion in L-025? See none; is there an <br />objection to L-025? See none, that amendment is adopted <br />unanimously Senator Entz. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 30 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.