My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-14 Senate Committee
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
4-14 Senate Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:51 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
4-14 Senate Committee
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4-14 Senate Committee <br />Interviewer, Interviewee <br /> <br />Page 20 of 37 <br /> <br />Finally, I think, Senator Tomin, the word "agent" is probably a <br />good one because an employee is also an agent, and if you have an <br />employee that the municipality or of a reservoir <br />company, someone who has superior knowledge that might be very <br />helpful on the round table, you want to be able to appoint them, <br />even though they don't necessarily own the water rights. The water <br />rights, for example, are in the city and county of Denver. <br /> <br />So all things considered, we think this is an intriguing idea. I <br />suspect that there will be, as there have been in some other <br />legislations, the need to come back and revisit it, maybe do a little <br />tweaking, but I think we're all willing to try this and re-thank the <br />DNR and the legislators who have helped us get it this far. So <br />unless there are any questions, thank you. <br /> <br />Chairman: <br /> <br />Thank you Sara, are there any questions for Ms. Duncan? Seeing <br />non - oh, sorry Senator Entz. <br /> <br />Senator Elltz: <br /> <br />Thank you, Mr. Chairman. What was the vote <br />Was it unanimous or no? <br /> <br />') <br /> <br />Sara DlIncan: No, it wasn't unanimous, but it was the two thirds that was needed, <br />and I'm sorry I don't remember. <br /> <br />Senator Elltz: What's Denver Water Board's position on this? <br /> <br />Sara DlIncan: They support this still, they Tip testify that he supported it in <br />concept, and now that these amendments have been made and it's <br />beginning to be clear how it might work, the board supports it still. <br /> <br />Chairman: Senator Tailor, did you have a question? <br /> <br />Sella tor Taylor: Yes I do, thank you Mr. Chairman. Sara, you said something about <br />26 referring to must be reservoir in the basin, I don't see that in <br />here. <br /> <br />Sara DlIllcall: Oh, no. It's amendment 26 I think you have, that was the <br />environmental amendment that said that it wanted to give a list of <br />national, state, and local environmentalists that might be appointed <br />by the round table, and I just wanted to make clear that we have no <br />opposition so long as they, as other members of the round table, <br />must be residents within the round table, within that basin. <br /> <br />Chairman: Senator Tochtrop? <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 20 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.