My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-14 Senate Committee
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
4-14 Senate Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:51 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
4-14 Senate Committee
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4-14 Senate Committee <br />Interviewer, Interviewee <br /> <br />Page 17 of 37 <br /> <br />A model we have not tried is the one that's seen here. That George <br />referenced and that is the model that was developed here in the <br />state of Colorado, for the Colorado River compact. <br /> <br />Compact actually will allow us to negotiate agreement between the <br />basin and the state of Colorado and solve the water wars that we <br />continue to face. It's a very difficult challenge; there are lots of <br />reasons why it won't be successful. We have very different <br />interests in the state of Colorado; geographically, economically, <br />socially, urban interests are different from mral interests, Ag. <br />differences. Interests are sometimes different from environmental <br />interests. <br /> <br />Water is finite. The drought has underscored this recently. We <br />have competitions and conflict for what is available; that is <br />inevitable. To date we would address this through litigation, but <br />that's not the best way. There are lots of reasons really well this <br />effort must be successfi.Jl. We live in an era today, maybe more era <br />than we've realized in the past; growth will continue. The urban <br />Front Range demands will continue to grow. <br /> <br />Ifwe can't figure out how to work together to meet the needs of <br />the entire state, none of us are going to prosper. We will continue <br />to fight and litigate and legislate. The weakest part of the state may <br />become sacrificed areas to support urban growth. Nothing else <br />we've tried to do has succeeded. There's little reason to believe it <br />will all of a sudden. We should try to, it is a bold move. I really <br />applaud Speaker George and encourage Senator Isgar and the other <br />sponsors on this bill. Their attempt to directly confront the issues <br />between the basin instead of . We have spent <br />tremendous amounts of time trying to throughout piecemeal or <br />indirectly over the years. <br />Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District urges the <br />committee's support for this legislation. Recently, the major <br />players in lower Arkansas have began talking, negotiating, to <br />resolve differences that were peace offers a proposal to expand fire <br />project storage. That hadn't happened, since the project was <br />organized in the 1950' s. What's remarkable is that this has been <br />going on for 60 days and we've made amazing progress. We <br />haven't reached an agreement yet, but everybody is committed to <br />talking, and once we've started talking, started seriously <br />negotiating, we've been moving forward. That makes me believe <br />that House Bill 1177 is going to work. Thank you senator, I'd be <br />glad to answer any questions. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 17 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.