Laserfiche WebLink
I don't have an amendment, but I'm looking for a little bit <br />of clarification here, because Senator Isgar and I had a <br />conversation yesterday or this morning or sometime in the hour <br />about the -- whether these existing projects coming from the <br />interbasin ac tivities, yet there -- and Frank McNulty made a <br />comment here, if I wrote it down correctly, "Only for projects <br />coming from 1177 and Interbasin entities." But yet, this <br />amendment that was just passed has the words "but expressly not <br />limited to" and I think t hat's what you were concerned about. <br />Are you -- is that covered in your mind, Senator Isgar, to <br />the discussion that you and I had, that it would not be limited <br />to, that the CWCB could do projects if they so desired coming <br />from other than Interbasin entitie s? <br />Chairman Grossman: <br />Senator Isgar? <br />Senator Isgar: <br />I believe so, Senator Taylor. <br />Senator Taylor: <br />I mean, this wording. <br />Senator Isgar: <br />I think -- well, I know [unintelligible] and <br />what -- I think you and I can make sure that it is -- that the <br />wording is [uni ntelligible] what we want. <br />Senator Taylor: <br />Senator Entz? <br />Senator Entz: <br />Thank you, Mr. Chairman. <br />I'd put it on CWCB and the authority at large. <br />[Unintelligible] with that language. <br />- 34 - <br /> <br />