Laserfiche WebLink
And of course, I sit on this. It's a statewide committee. <br />And I don't know what happens to the -- I mean, we have the chief <br />task, or some of us, about writing a charter, getting it to you <br />guys by July 1. I don't know what happens if we fail in doing <br />that, be cause it might not be prudent from a drafted standpoint <br />to put it in -- to talk about the roundtables in here because, if <br />we fail with our next task -- well, I think that was probably a <br />good drafting decision by Senator Isgar. <br />Chairman Grossman: <br />One other que stion. You know, you and <br />I worked very hard, along with a lot of other people, to defeat <br />Referendum A. And part of the reason, at least in my mind and <br />in my heart, to oppose that was because I thought that it was a <br />funding mechanism that really wasn't ne cessary if it was doing <br />what the proponents said it was going to do. <br />And one of the things that I heard from a lot of people who <br />were supportive of Referendum A is that we needed some <br />resources, not loans, but we needed some resources for smaller <br />water pro jects, or projects just to improve exiting water <br />projects, not necessarily the big, huge, mammoth that would <br />never have a chance from a permitting standpoint or from a local <br />input standpoint and from an environmental standpoint, but some <br />of the smaller pro jects that could improve water quality, that <br />could improve water supply, efficiency and that kind of thing. <br />- 14 - <br /> <br />