Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Prioritizing the flow rates necessary to restore the <br /> <br />environment would be looking more at opportunities for possibly <br /> <br />an [unintelligible] flow program or something along those lines. <br /> <br />It would be something that was different than purely a <br /> <br />permitting or a compliance based. <br /> <br />Chairperson Curry: Representative White? <br /> <br />Representative White: <br /> <br />So, does that mean--I'm not sure. <br /> <br />Does that mean then that, under the ausplces of this bill, a <br /> <br />higher level of consideration would be given to environmental <br /> <br />and recreational flows than would be given to irrigation flows <br /> <br />and/or municipal and industrial flows? <br /> <br />Ms. Bolton: Madame Chair? <br /> <br />Chairperson Curry: Ms. Bolton. <br /> <br />Ms. Bolton: No, I don't believe, Representative White, <br /> <br />that it would do that. <br /> <br />I think that prioritize in this case <br /> <br />would be between environmental flows. You're prioritizing one <br /> <br />flow over another flow, not prioritizing environmental flows <br /> <br />over an irrigation flow or any other type of water right. <br /> <br />Representative White: Um-hum. <br /> <br />Chairperson Curry: Representative Gardner? <br /> <br />Representative Gardner: <br /> <br />Thank you, Madame Chair. <br /> <br />Ms. Bolton, the SWSI--this is the companlon plece to 1177, <br /> <br />which took the data from the SWSI, the Statewide Storage <br /> <br />Initiative--Supply Initiative, taking that data, looking at it-- <br /> <br />- 10 - <br />