My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12486
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2007 11:03:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.109
Description
Colorado River Basin Projects - Long Hollow
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/2004
Author
Wright Water Engineers
Title
Long Hollow Dam and Reservoir - Phase I Summary Report - Preliminary Drafts - (no final) 05-01-04 through 06-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001718 <br /> <br />Long Hollow Dam and Reservoir Summary Report-Preliminary Draft <br /> <br />9.0 SUMMARY OF FEASIBILITY STUDY FINDINGS <br /> <br />Key findings of this feasibility study include: <br /> <br />1. The geologic conditions at the proposed LHR site are acceptable for design and <br />construction. H-P's feasibility-level engineering/geology study at the site reported that, <br />the site was technically feasible for a dam and reservoir. <br /> <br />2. A Section 404 (Y/etlands) permit likely can be obtained with a reasonable amount of <br />additional study. Threshold issues, such as minimization of impacts to waters of the <br />U.S., an acceptable mitigation plan, and a non-jeopardy finding for T &E species <br />protected by the ESA appear possible and the issues of concern te-be resolvable. Based <br />on discussions and technical data evaluation with CDOW, the native fishery in the lower <br />La Plata River can be protected without jeopardizing LHR purposes. U.S. Environmental <br />Protection Agency (USEPA) acceptance of the permit conditions is critical. <br /> <br />3. Based on a water allocation model that simulated water supply and distribution for the <br />l4-year study period, there is adequate water available in-priority for storage in LHR to <br />meet the purposes of the project. On average, an estimated 3,540 AF/yr can be stored in <br />LHR to help meet Compact demands at the state line gauge, while allowing Colorado <br />ditches to divert supplemental irrigation water by exchange. An LHR operation plan <br />study indicates that both Colorado and New Mexico irrigators will benefit from LHR and <br />that Colorado's ability to meet its Compact delivery obligation will be improved, <br />especially during split river administration conditions. <br /> <br />4. The LHR project appears to be financially feasible if the money ($16 million now) <br />escrowed for La Plata River irrigation projects in the Authority's Future Projects Escrow <br />Agreement is allocated to the project. WWE's project reconnaissance-level (+/-50 %) <br />opinion of LHR cost is $19.7 million. No engineering or geotechnical data were <br />available in the development of this opinion of cost. The size of the reservoir could be <br />reduced to fit available funding, if necessary. (Would a smaller reservoir still meet the <br />purpose and need? If not. this could be fatal flaw. ) (How much refinement in cost is <br /> <br />991-077.115 <br />May 2004 <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br /> <br />Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.