My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:14 PM
Creation date
7/24/2007 8:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.130
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - Upper Colorado River Commission- UCRC
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1993
Author
James S Lochhead
Title
Colorado's Role in Emerging Water Policy on the Colorado River - Jim Lochhead - Presented to the Colorado Water Congress - 1993 Summer Convention - 06-01-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,nj 3 283 <br /> <br />. The historic yields of existing water projects must be protected. Environmentally <br />and economically, it makes no sense to reallocate resources away from existing <br />projects. The challenge is to make existing projects more efficient, so that the <br />overall water resource can be better managed. In this regard, operations of <br />existing projects should be reevaluated, and if necessary, changed, to accomplish <br />the same yield to the end user in a way compatible with multiple purposes. <br /> <br />. The Lower Basin should develop solutions within the Lower Basin to Lower <br />Basin water supply allocation issues. For example, water could be shifted among <br />the Lower Division States in ways which would resolve Nevada's long-term <br />needs, firm up MWD's yield within California's basic apportionment, and lend <br />financial stability to Arizona water users. <br /> <br />. Colorado and the other Upper Division States should be willing to address issues <br />of operational flexibility of Colorado River system reservoirs to maximize use in <br />the entire Basin consistent with environmental and power needs, within the limits <br />of protection to state entitlements afforded by the Law of the River. This will <br />give more certainty to the Lower Basin on when and under what conditions <br />surplus water can be used and how shortages will be administered. <br /> <br />. Colorado has a need, and a commitment, to recover the Colorado River <br />endangered fish species. In order to -accomplish that recovery, the following <br />should be accomplished: <br /> <br />Funding for the Recovery Implementation Program should be made <br />certain. <br /> <br />Consultations by the Fish and Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the <br />Endangered Species Act should reflect the certainty of funding of the <br />Recovery Implementation Program, by protecting the historic yield of <br />existing water projects, and by allowing the full development of <br />Colorado's Compact entitlement consistent with the Recovery Program. <br /> <br />Colorado should undertake a program to manage habitat to prevent future <br />listings and habitat designations, and to prevent takings. <br /> <br />. Colorado has need for additional incremental water development to meet <br />identified demands. The approach undertaken by water user groups such as the <br />San Miguel Water Conservancy District should be encouraged. <br /> <br />. In order to secure a source of funding for the Recovery Implementation Program, <br />and achieve a level of additional incremental and defined water development, <br />Colorado should be willing to consider the deauthorization of federally-authorized <br />but unbuilt Colorado projects, and should be willing to analyze the benefits of <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.