Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />soils repOli prepared for the feasibility study, we cun-ently anticipate using both native onsite material as <br />well as overlying emih fill and tailings material as pmi of the reservoir. The tailings material is less <br />desirable as fill material and will be used in pOliions of the reservoir where structural strength is not <br />critical. Based on the preliminalY grading shown, approximately 15,000 cubic yards offill would have to <br />be inipOlied in addition to the onsite material. A portion or all of this material import may be able to be <br />reduced or eliminated during final design but may also reduce the storable volume ofthe reservoir to <br />obtain a no impOli solution. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although removal of the tailings material could reduce potential risk, doing so would re~ult in greater <br />earthwork costs since more imported fill would be required and tailings would have to disposed of <br />offsite. Site soils are relatively sandy and a PVC or membrane liner will be utilized to control seepage <br />from the reservoir. Liners may eventually puncture or leak and a double liner with internal drainage <br />material could be provided to reduce the risk of seepage or impacts to potentially hazardous materials in <br />the tailings or underlying material, however, constructiori costs would increase substantially. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A soil cover will be placed on the liner and soil cement will be utilized along the dam embankment to <br />minimize soil erosion due to waves when the reservoir is full. A pipe riser and outlet pipe will serve as <br />the spillway of the reservoir to release storm flows in excess of reservoir capacity safely to the West Fork <br />of Clear Creek. A low level gated outlet pipe will be utilized to release augmentation flows when <br />necessary or to drain the reservoir for maintenance. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flow will be diverted into the reservoir via a control structure and pipeline along Bard Creek Road from <br />its crossing with Bard Creek approximately Yz mile south of the reservoir to the reservoir site. A <br />plan/profile of the diversion pipeline is shown in Figure 4 of this report. The pipeline is designed for a <br />maximum capacity of 5.0 cfs. At a flow rate of 5.0 cfs, the reservoir will fill in 11.1 days_ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Alternatives Considered <br /> <br />During an initial site visit with Town ofEinpire officials, interest was expressed in providing a bench <br />above the normal pool elevation for use as an mnphitheater.- This was considered and would be possible, <br />but would significantly increase construction costs since a larger quantity of earth fill would have to be <br />impOlied to facilitate the request. Providing the bench would also reduce available storage volume below <br />the desired 110 acre-feet of storage capacity. <br /> <br />The eastern portion of the embankment extends onto property not currently owned by the Town of <br />Empire and it would have been desirable to avoid the necessity of acquiring additional land or easements <br />if feasible. Again, avo~ding the privately owned property would be physically possible, but would <br />greatly increase the volume of imported fill required and substantially decrease storage volume. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 <br />