My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00279
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:29:19 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 2:18:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Applied Weather Associates Responses to Corps of Engineers Questions on the AWS Study of Cherry Creek PMP, Sept 2006
Prepared For
USACE
Prepared By
Applied Weather Associates
Date
1/29/2007
County
Douglas
Weather Modification - Doc Type
General Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~i <' .. <br /> <br />UPPER KIOWA CREEK BASIN <br /> <br />May 30 - 31, 1935 Storm Cells A-2 and A-3 <br /> <br />Hydrologic Modeling Analysis <br /> <br />By Douglas J, Trieste, P.H., Flow Technologies <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />A rainfalllrunoff(RF/RO) modeling study was performed on Upper Kiowa Ck Basin for the <br />purpose of evaluating if the May 30-31, 1935 storm (as documented) can explain measured peak <br />discharge data on Upper Kiowa Ck. <br /> <br />The centers ofthe May 30-31,1935 A-2 and A-3 Cells were positioned over Kiowa Ck basin <br />such that their consequent runoff happened to have peak discharge measurements at critical <br />locations, That is, Cell A-2 is centered over both Kiowa Ck above Elbert and West Kiowa Ck, <br />and a discharge measurement is available just downstream of Elbert (confluence of West Kiowa <br />Ck and Kiowa Ck) (Fig 1 and Table 1). Cell A-3 is centered between Elbert and Kiowa, with an <br />available discharge measurement at Kiowa (Fig 1 and Table 1), The positioning of the cells and <br />measured discharge lends itself to RF/RO modeling of the cells to determine if they can <br />reasonably simulate the measured peak discharge. <br /> <br />HEC-l was the model of choice. Model components most appropriate for this study included <br />Snyder Unit Hydrograph, initiallconstant rainfall loss, and rainfall mass curves specific to the <br />rainfall. <br /> <br />Although numerous sub-basins can be input into HEC-I, modeling resolution was low with only <br />three sub-basins considered - Kiowa Ck at Elbert (above the confluence with West Kiowa Ck), <br />West Kiowa Ck, and Kiowa Ck between Elbert and Kiowa (refer to Fig. 1). Such low modeling <br />resolution was used because of budget constraints, and because the desired modeling results were <br />"ball park;" that is, if results were within the range of hydrologic uncertainty and reasonable, <br />they were deemed sufficient for the purpose of this study. <br /> <br />In addition to May 30-31, 1935 measured peak discharge data, USGS peak discharge data, and <br />storm isohyetals, are available on Kiowa Creek for the June 17, 1965 floods (Table I and Figure <br />1), Because the 1965 isohyetals are well documented and considered accurate, those can be <br />applied for model testing, USGS discharge data is available for Kiowa Creek at Elbert (above <br />West Kiowa Ck confluence), and West Kiowa Ck at Elbert for the 1965 flood, but not for 1935. <br /> <br />The HEC-1 model was tested for reasonableness for Kiowa Ck at Elbert, and West Kiowa Ck at <br />Elbert based on the June 17, 1965 rainfall, and USGS discharge measurements. That model was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.