Laserfiche WebLink
<br />going. Russell said that the Department of Natural Resources' 1 177 group must report to <br />the Legislature annually, and they need to have a complete report that includes all basin <br />roundtables. Much of the repOlting can be done in George's office. This roundtable <br />needs to decide how it is going to get it done within the next three weeks. A reporting <br />template or outline will be sent out from Russell's office. John, Steve, Ken & Jenny will <br />work on the repOlt. Mr. George went on to say that by January or February, roundtables <br />need to bite the bullet in order to add value to the large issue that faces us. The IBCC <br />needs to do this also and decide what is the IBCC's next step? This will set the tone for <br />this whole process. He suggested that this roundtable might need to wait for a look at <br />projects before attempting a "vision." Because the development of a 'vision" could be so <br />difficult, a facilitator may be necessary. Discussion continued. Leo Large added that this <br />roundtable needs to set priorities. And it was noted that at the previous IBCC meeting, a <br />lengthy ag conversion discussion took place, and the ag conversion group from DNR can <br />be invited to any roundtable meeting. Sen. Isgar said that HB 1177 is suppose to meet <br />our unmet needs, and isn't that our vision? Isn't this where we start? How? Whose <br />water? Who is paying for it? He noted that every basin has different needs, and this <br />process has to start with meeting the needs of the individual basins. The senator spoke to <br />the fact that each basin is different but each is connected. Russell George told <br />participants that rural areas need allies because with the continuing growth in population, <br />particularly in the Denver area, the one person one vote situation is critical. Decisions are <br />going to be made in Denver, and rural areas need to help them solve their problems <br />before they become a political storm. Kay Hartman added that population growth areas <br />on the Western Slope have something to learn from the East Slopers. <br /> <br />Replacement of "At-Large" position: Ann Oliver and Jim Siscoe have contacted Steve <br />about the vacant position. According to the legal notice published in area newspapers, <br />October 9 deadline for applying. Other basin roundtable bylaws have set out a procedure <br />for reappointments, but not this one. The "At-Large" position will, therefore, be filled at <br />the November 16 meeting in Durango. <br /> <br />Water Supply Reserve Account: (See attached) <br />Russell George explained that a working group or drafting group, consisting of three <br />members of CWCB + others, is in place. The work group will meet this Friday and <br />complete what they will take to the CWCB. The proposed documents will then be back <br />in front of the IBCC in November. He said that all the roundtables have had the same <br />experience - the IBCC didn't reach consensus either on the accounts. Russell said that if <br />we don't get it right, let's just see how it goes as we start getting proposals for projects. <br />John Porter added that he basically saw two issues: the lack of a consensus and the <br />reason for two the two accounts, the basin account and statewide account. One reason <br />could be that there is a fear big projects from the Front Range will take up all the money. <br />The local roundtable will have to decide which account a particular project should be <br />funded from. Most pmticipants agreed that we are just stmting and don't know where we <br />will end up. Discussion continued about the IBCC's involvement in a statewide vision, <br />whether or not preference should be given to loans or grants, the requirement that all <br />projects have to go through the threshold, and each basin should apply their own criteria. <br />