My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 13 South Platte Minutes
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
March 13 South Platte Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:15:52 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 11:27:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
Minutes
Date
3/13/2007
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of reservoirs is important; thus, nOlmal monitoring is intense; this is <br />different than when you started process. <br /> <br />Ross Bethel: Discusses last item: Model application for Consumable <br />Effluent Reuse <br /> <br />Fred Walker: Any specific order that these will happen in? <br />Ifwe receive more money after July, is there a significant relationship? <br /> <br />Ross Bethel: No, but there are some that need to be done together. <br />The model must be the first thing to happen for the analysis <br /> <br />Web Jones: Big conditionals on the Platte; how will you address that <br />question? <br />Ross Bethel: Interviews with water providers will uncover much <br />information. <br /> <br />Web Jones: So...you will be able to tell us, if Harden is built or ifnot....? <br /> <br />Bruce Gerk: RE: 11 a "Reduction of irrigated acreage demands <br />downstream of Greeley because oflack of augmentation supplies." <br />Demand for water has not lessened; the priority system is in effect; <br />curtailment does not reflect a reduced demand; just shows inadequacy of <br />demands; we pass over the ag sector over and over again in this process. <br />Fact is you will not answer demands without big storage projects to <br />capture water. <br /> <br />Bert Weaver: Re: "Applicability of model to major tributaries"; thinking <br />of Clear Creek; how will trans mountain diversions affect this? <br /> <br />Ross Bethel: we will be creating a baseline study. <br /> <br />Sue: Summarize what CDM will do: <br />Will prioritize 2030, then get info on 2050, will rewrite to include main <br />tributaries, will look at attaching DSS as a module to see how it can be <br />used to address the well augmentation plans; thus we will redo this and <br />send back out. <br /> <br />Mike Shimmin: Please give us a price tag on optional items under no. 26; <br />we would like to know what this will cost to add on as an option. <br />(No. 26: Optional: Model Application for other Impact Analyses: <br />a) Non-consumptive demands such as the recreational in-channel <br />diversions. <br />b) Conservation <br />c) Climate Variability (such as effects of reduced basin yields) <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.