Laserfiche WebLink
<br />technical platfOlm. The holes in SWSI are what we are working <br />on. <br /> <br />Harold Evans: Can we move forward that initially would like to <br />look at 2030 then we are okay with going to 2050? <br /> <br />Mike Shimmin: Would like cost breakdown. <br /> <br />Sue: Yes, can do that. <br /> <br />Walter Knudsen: Must still include priorities per costs. <br /> <br />Mike Shimmin: to return to Harold's comment: are we in <br />consensus about 2030 or 2050 so that I know per IBCe. <br /> <br />Sue: I will get better information per costing estimates on state- <br />wide basis of2050. <br /> <br />Harold: Assuming that we concur with this scope of work in a <br />general format, are you prepared to start this scope of work? <br /> <br />Sue: We are keeping the work continuous; <br /> <br />Harold: We submitted this request in September and nothing has <br />happened. <br /> <br />Fred Walker: We still have no clear direction for Mike Shimmin <br />per the IBCe. <br /> <br />Mike Shimmin: Can we get our answers to 2030 first, then go <br />forward to 2050? <br /> <br />Fred Walker calls for a vote on going forward first with 2030, <br />then moving to 2050. Consensus and Resolution. <br /> <br />Comments on Note NO.3 on page 1 of Preliminary Draft Outline Approach <br />for South Platte Basin Roundtable Refinements: <br />#3. Collect/summarize additional information on the water sources that each <br />major provider is contemplating using to meet future (2050) demands. <br />Identify if the same sources of water are counted in available supplies for <br />multiple providers. <br />Per note a) (Limit providers for this study to those contemplated to <br />provide at least 1,000 afin 2050) <br />Harold Evans: question per limit of providers for this study to those <br />contemplated to provide at least 1000 af ... where did this number come <br />from? <br /> <br />6 <br />