My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
South Platte Basin Roundtable Nov 14 minutes.d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
South Platte Basin Roundtable Nov 14 minutes.d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:17:48 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 10:25:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
Minutes
Date
11/14/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />--Silt has decreased storage capacity by 40-60%; hydraulic dredging offers <br />possibility without draining of reservoirs; hydraulic dredging can dredge to 25' <br />without dismptions of reservoir cycle; <br /> <br />IV. Water Rights Modeling between Black Hawk and Central City: <br />Presented by Rick Parsons with Leonard Rice <br /> <br />CDSS website (cdss.state.co.us) has centralized water data base; data and models <br />to evaluate alternative water development and strategies; site has state model for <br />surface water; site has location information; water rights information; ownership <br />information; etc. <br />--Case study: Upper North Clear Creek model: how to enhance overall yield <br />--Summary: identify potential project in which the towns can work together <br /> <br />V. Water Activities for Water Supply Reserve Account Funding <br />--Process for management and presentation of potential projects for roundtable <br />consideration: establish a methodology? nomination subcommittee? other? <br />Eric Wilkinson: re: criteria and guidelines: <br />1) projects have to be reviewed by the roundtable within which the water is <br />being diverted; <br />2) CWBC asks roundtable for recommendations and considers projects based on <br />the degree of support fi-om the roundtable; CWBC wants to know of dissent <br />and why: preference to projects where consensus has been built; <br />3) The criteria asks fro a report thus the idea of minority report that would <br />articulate opposition would be good; <br />4) Application and criteria have been emailed to everyone; <br /> <br />Mike Shimmin: Motion to establish a mle that requires any entity or individual to <br />provide a completed application to every member of the Roundtable one week <br />prior to the meeting at which time the application will be considered <br />Bob Stencil: Second <br />Motion carries unanimously <br /> <br />--Consideration of specific water activities: <br />1) Joint project with Colorado, Arkansas and Metro Roundtables to identify <br />alternatives for providing 10,825 acft to the 15 mile reach for endangered species <br />compliance: Janet Bell speaks to the cooperative nature of the concept and how it <br />could provide a permanent answer to the 50/50 split between the South Platte and <br />Arkansas for compliance with the endangered species act; this would include 4 <br />roundtables: South Platte, Metro, Arkansas and Colorado <br />--to date, Denver Water has been providing 50% and would like to get <br />roundtables to take over; <br />--Eric Wilkinson comment: By 2009, must have 10,589 ac ft in place; Arkansas <br />Roundtable will discuss; we need a resolution fi-om the Roundtable in order to <br />find solution; <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.