Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />would have a serious impact on their productive hay meadows and cause seepage into their <br />buildings. This alternative was rejected <br /> <br />d.) Alternative IV, involving two diversions, is the same as Alternative III with the inclusion <br />of a diversion for Marshall-Roberts. It carries the same drawback described by Mr. <br />Blakeslee. <br /> <br />e.) Alternative V, involving two permanent diversion structures, combines the Marshall- <br />Roberts and Williams into one structure at Mt. Harris and the second for Walker and Shelton, <br />where the Walker ditch diverts from the original streambed. Provision for vessel and fish <br />passage will be provided at both structures. Presently the ranchers build a gravel dam across <br />the present channel to divert water into the old channel and a second gravel dam to feed their <br />headgate. The plan is to move the river back to its original channel and construct a new <br />headgate to serve both ditches. <br /> <br />t) Alternative IIA, involving one diversion would be the same as Alternative II except the <br />Gibraltar Ditch would not be included. <br /> <br />6 <br />