Laserfiche WebLink
- isn’t necessarily money to “go build stuff” — see bill for description - stressed that it’s not <br />about building big projects, but to help smaller entities do feasibility studies and prepare <br />projects for their needs — hopefully this effort will help smaller districts have money to do <br />planning and prep for their priorities — also stressed that requests have to come from the <br />RT’s, not meant to be a “ top down ” effort rather driven by local entities in each basin, <br />not from Denver — stressed how important it is for each RT to develop its needs <br />assessment and bring that to the IBCC — may be hard to develop criteria before needs <br />assessment is complete, but will have to do both at the same time — must ask ourselves: <br />what are our most compelling needs and what requests can we make to address <br />these??? Everyone should right up theirs - what can we do to reduce demands? My <br />need is this ________ -- look at projects that can address that — over next 3 months max <br />so they can be presented <br /> <br />Travis — referred to tasks listed in minutes <br />Mike G — asks each member to think about the needs each see for their interests – write <br />up and send to Mike for Sub - Committee to discuss <br /> <br />Steve — thinks criteria development will come quickly as is current draft — more will be <br />coming soon and expects at June 30 meeting will be a push to have draft criteria <br />developed <br /> <br />Mike - suggests that at this meeting we take time to look at these criteria and give <br />feedback tonight <br /> <br />Jerry Pacheco e xpressed concern that not all CDOW reps are present <br />Steve & Ray assured that all comments are welcome at anytime, but Steve said we <br />cannot wait to get started as things are moving quickly <br /> <br />Charlie — thinks that criteria is so general that just about any proj ect would fit <br /> <br />Mike G. – wants us to discu ss criteria suggestions <br /> <br />Jason - provided background on spirit of this — no one has submitted criteria as yet, <br />Subcommittee has background on grants and loans, but for now, the “sky is the limit”, <br />the intent was to be a broad as possible and to allow a focus to develop based on each <br />basin’s needs — CWCB will manage program, but will have to do so within criteria and <br />guidelines — what does the Basin want to provide for? SWSI is not the final product for <br />Rio Grande, but i s a foundation for us. <br /> <br />Ray — would like to get a general sense of the criteria as a starting point for the <br />committee to work with <br /> <br />Mike G — called for the next 15 minutes for everyone to read the memo from Eric Hecox <br />before breaking for dinner at 6 PM <br /> <br />6 PM b roke for dinner <br /> Page 2 of 11 RGBRT <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> June 12 , 2006 <br />