My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RGBRT Minutes of 12-12-06
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
RGBRT Minutes of 12-12-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:17:16 PM
Creation date
7/16/2007 12:27:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Rio Grande
Title
Minutes
Date
12/12/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Travis-if Terrace is successful-there is no need for competitive bid process once <br />approved-can hire the consultants/attorneys/engineers of their choice <br /> <br />Doug S-agrees with Mel-anytime we can get numbers and info, it benefits us- <br />applauds group for their proactive approach-best way to approach any problem is <br />through the best information possible <br /> <br />Glen-no one in this Valley has been hit as hard as Alamosa River-Summitville- <br />anything we can do to help is good <br /> <br />Ed-agrees needs more storage-but more storage won't help if we don't reduce <br />pumping too <br /> <br />John Shawcroft- asks: what are we going to do for the next generation? Want to <br />accomplish something - pleads with us to take advantage of opportunities when we <br />have them <br /> <br />Fred-supports project-but concerned that in Crestone the engineers estimates were <br />a fraction of past floods- <br /> <br />Mike G-need to rely on experts <br /> <br />JB-supports project-notes on P2 something he'd like to see changed-would like to <br />strike ethnicity referral-would like to be based upon science not ethnicity <br /> <br />Cindy-put in because required <br /> <br />Ray-will support project and would like to see it go forward-- would like to have <br />modeling address the goals of delivering wet water for up to 200 days per year is <br />practical and not result in potential problems of icing etc-if this fatal flaw is revealed <br />from engineering analysis, redirect efforts <br /> <br />Steve V-a historic moment in his career-agrees with John Shawcroft!!!! <br />. they've been working on this for 25 years, if going to be done, needs to be done <br />now-with political climate, money available, etc-many questions and if they hit <br />walls, be willing to change course-try to use other studies as needed <br /> <br />Mike G-ready to make a motion <br /> <br />Robert Bagwell-moves to 64500 <br />Fred 2nd <br /> <br />Charlie S-wants his concerns in record- <br /> <br />Approved unanimously <br /> <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />RGBRT <br /> <br />Minutes <br /> <br />December 12, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.