My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10363 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10363 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:49:17 PM
Creation date
7/13/2007 9:28:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gunnison
Community
Gunnison County
Stream Name
East River, Cement Creek, Alkali Creek, Ohio Creek
Title
Gunnison County Flood Hydrology, Contract # W99-D-0018 Final Report
Date
11/1/2004
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers, CWCB and Gunnison County
Prepared By
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />*( ) (2St)_ * (2St+l) <br />C II + 11+1 + !1t - C Ot+l + ~ <br /> <br />C = coefficient of conversion cfs to acre-feet per day <br />It = Inflow at time t, cfs <br />11+1 = Inflow at time t+ 1, cfs <br />SI = Storage at time t, acre feet <br />St+1 = Storage at time t+ 1, acre feet <br />01 = Outflow at time t, cfs <br />Ot+1 = Outflow at time t+ 1, cfs <br /> <br />The left side of the equation contains variables given from the starting conditions (from Steps 3 and 4) <br />and input hydrograph. The right side of the equation contains the storage and outflow for the next <br />time step that are to be solved. The goal seek function (iterative solver routine) in Excel was used <br />along with the outflow guidelines (see Step 4) and the stage-storage-discharge relationship to solve <br />for the 01+1 and St+1 variables in the right side of the equation. <br /> <br />The time step is advanced by one with the outflow and storage solution becoming the known <br />variables for the left side of the Modified Puis routing equation and the solution process was <br />repeated. The procedure is continued until the entire hydrograph is processed. The resulting <br />hydrograph is the regulated 1 percent chance exceedence Taylor River below Taylor Park Reservoir. <br /> <br />6. Determine the Regulated Taylor River at Almont Hydrograph Flow. The Taylor River local flow <br />contribution (from Step 2) was added to the regulated 1 percent chance exceedence Taylor River <br />below Taylor Park Reservoir hydrograph (from Step 5) to create the regulated 1 percent chance <br />exceedence Taylor River at Almont hydrograph. <br /> <br />7. Determine the Regulated Gunnison River at Almont Hydrograph. The East River hydrograph <br />(from Step 1) was added to the regulated Taylor River at Almont hydrograph (from Step 6) to create <br />the regulated Gunnison River at A1mont hydrograph. <br /> <br />8. Determine the Regulated Gunnison River near Gunnison Hydrograph. The regulated Gunnison <br />River hydrograph (from Step 7) was added to the Ohio Creek at Gunnison hydrograph (from Step 2) <br />to create the regulated Gunnison River near Gunnison hydrograph. <br /> <br />6.3.4 Starting Water Surface Elevation <br /> <br />The starting reservoir water surface at the beginning of simulation was set at 9,328 feet (2 feet below the <br />spillway crest elevation of 9,330) per guidance provided by Coli Stanton of Bureau of Reclamation (see <br />Section 6.3.2). The guidance states that the reservoir would be operated for irrigation supply, to maintain <br />a pool elevation of 2 to 3 feet below the spillway crest when possible. The simulation was started with the <br />assumption that the reservoir was filled to the 9,328 feet desired water surface elevation stated in the <br />guidance. <br /> <br />6.4 RESUL 1S <br /> <br />The model was run with the initial reservoir stage as described in Section 6.3.3. The lower-level outlet <br />gates were operated as discussed in Section 6.3.2. The resulting peak discharges are listed in Table <br />6.4.1 with the resulting hydrographs in Figure 6.4.1. The peak flows for the unregulated and regulated <br />hydrographs developed by the spreadsheet model are listed as well as the difference in cfs and <br />percentage. <br /> <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.