My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ02092
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJ02092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2011 11:23:36 AM
Creation date
7/13/2007 8:14:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150180
Contractor Name
Pinewood Springs Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
4
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION VI <br />EVALUATION OF ALTERNATES <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The altemate solutions identified in Section V have been evaluated to determine if they will meet the <br />Pinewood Springs Water District's requirements of providing: <br /> <br />· between 20-40 acre-feet of raw water storage, <br />· enhanced system reliability for 350 EQR, and <br />. 50 gpm of water treatment capacity <br /> <br />at a reasonable cost. <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF ALTERNATES <br /> <br />Introduction <br />General: The Pinewood Springs Water District performed an initial screening of available <br />altematives. Those altematives which were deemed to be viable by the District were studied in <br />more detail by McLaughlin Water Engineers. The results of both the initial screening and the <br />engineering study are present below. <br /> <br />The altemates analyzed for this Planning Document have been evaluated to comparable levels of <br />accuracy so a good, conceptual comparison could be carried out. Additional information is available <br />for some of the altematives which corresponds to preliminary design level accuracy. For example, <br />geotechnical information is available for the Crescent Lake/Powelson Reservoir site which is not <br />available for the other reservoir sites. When such additional information has been used as the basis <br />for making assumptions generally applied to all the sites, it is included in the appendices. <br /> <br />Cost Estimates: Project budgets for pipelines were prepared, wherever possible, using <br />construction contract costs encountered by the Pinewood Springs Water District for a recent project. <br />Manufacturers representatives provided approximate costs of major material items including the <br />water treatment plant modules, pumps, stand-by power generators, and control and power panels. <br />Crew costs, equipment costs and general construction costs were developed from Means <br />Construction Cost Guide 2001 as adjusted for approximate location and inflation based on <br />Engineering News Record Indexes. The costs include materials and an estimated level of effort for <br />installation. The costs are based on conceptual designs, and are considered adequate for the level <br />of work used for preparation of this report. Since all unit costs were based on similar pricing, the <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.