Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1966) irrigation right at the 29 Road Pump Station. All return flows within the District <br />boundaries belong to the District. Water right lands within the District have a base <br />allocation of 8.18 gallons per minute (gpm) per acre, continuous flow. The system is <br />classified as an "on demand" system, which means that the canals must be at the proper <br />levels at all times to deliver at any and all headgates the required 8.18 gpm. This may be <br />reduced in times of shortage by "pinching" headgates on the system to restrict the flows <br />at the headgates. <br /> <br />Project Description and Alternatives <br /> <br />The purpose of this project is to provide a dependable means for the District to continue <br />providing irrigation water to landowners while ensuring no damage to nearby homes and <br />highway. A Technical Feasibility Study was completed in 2005, funded by a matching <br />grant from the Colorado Water Conservation Board. In that study, four alternatives were <br />considered: <br /> <br />1. Repair the siphon. <br />2. Replace the siphon - cast in place <br />3. Replace the siphon - precast option <br />4. No action. <br /> <br />Alternative #1 <br /> <br />The existing Stokes Gulch inverted siphon is in poor condition. Originally constructed in <br />the 1920's, concrete is spalling off of the structure, leaving large areas of exposed <br />reinforcing and willows are growing on top of the siphon, the roots of which have <br />punched through the existing concrete. The siphon has a running water leak on the <br />downhill side, facing Highway 6, plus leaks in many other places on the siphon. A <br />failure during irrigation season could lead to a lengthy period without water for irrigation <br />needs. Repairing the siphon is not practical or feasible. <br /> <br />Alternative #2 <br /> <br />The structure would be poured-in-place. The conduit would be a 12' x 12' square box. <br />Existing inlet and outlet concrete would be salvaged and rehabilitated to the maximum <br />extent possible. The cost of this option would be about $570,000. Since the Technical <br />Feasibility Study was completed, a large fault has been discovered in the concrete lining <br />the Power Canal from the invert of the Stokes Gulch Siphon stretching upstream <br />approximately 300'. Emergency repairs were made in order to keep water in the canal <br />during the winter of 2005/2006, however, a permanent repair will now be added to the <br />replacement project in order to stop the leaking that is affecting the home immediately <br />below this area. The cost ofthat repair is estimated at $85,700 and would be added to the <br />$570,000, making a total project cost of $656,000. Since the cost ofthis option would be <br />higher than the cost of the pre-cast option, this is not the preferred alternative. <br /> <br />Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Feasibility Study <br />Stokes Gulch Siphon <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />