CT2015-052 Feasibility Study

• Contract/PO #: CT2015-052
• Contract/PO #: C150192
• Contractor Name: Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District
• Contract Type: Loan
• Water District: 11
• County: Chaffee
• County: Custer
• County: Fremont
• Loan Projects - Doc Type: Feasibility Study

I~

r

1920"5

BOOK

424 rAGE 771

I

assessed valuation thereof, ana. whether each signer is the owner

df irrigated lands or nonirrigated lands, or lands embraced in.

the incorporated limits of a city or town situated in the

proposed District.

3. That the Clerk of this Court has caused notice of the

pendency of said petition and of the time.and place .of hearing

hereon, by publication of "Notice" in the following newspapers, to-wit:

"HoWltain Mail," a legal newspaper of general circulation in Chaffee

. County; "The Canon City. Daily Record," a legal newspaper of general

circulation in Fremont County. That said publication was made in

each of said newspapers in the manner as required by law as more

fully "appears by affidavits of publication on file in this cause.

That the Clerk of this Court, .on February 12, 1979, caused a copy

of said Notice to be mailed, by United States registered mail, to each

of the Boards of COWlty Commissioners of Chaffee and Fremont COWlties,

as more fully appears by the affidavit of mailing of said notices

on file in this cause.

I

I

I

I

I

I

4. That no protesting petition or petitions have been

filed.

I

5. That said petition has been signed by more than

twenty-five (25) percent of the qualified owners of irrigated land

situated within the limits of the territory proposed to be organized

into the District and not embraced within the incorporated limits of

a city or town; and each tract of land is listed opposite the name of

each signer and each such tract (or tracts), together with improve-

ments thereon, has an assessed value of not less than One Thousand"

Dollars ($1,000); and said petition has been signed by more than

five (5) percent of the qualified owners of lands embraced in the

incorporated limits of cities and towns, all situated in the proposed

District; and each tract (or tracts) is listed opposite the name of

each sisner and each such tract (or tracts), together with improve-

ments thereon, has an assessed value of more than One Thousand

Dollars ($1,000); that said petition has been signed and presented

in full conformity with the "Water Conservancy Act" of Colorado.

6. That there are no cities or towns or cities and counties

included within the proposed District having a population of more

than twenty-five thousand (25,000) as determined by the last United

States census.

7. That this Court has jurisdiction of the parties to,

and the subject matter of, this proceeding.

8. That the petition in all respects complies with, and

conforms to, the requirements of said Water Conservancy Act, and the

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

-2-

I

I