Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. The roundtable unanimously agreed to revise the June 2006 resolution to recommend that the <br />Grand Junction Bureau of Reclamation office manage Green Mountain Reservoir. The revised <br />resolution recommends that the reservoir be managed by an unprejudiced agency in a fair and <br />impartial manner. <br /> <br />August 26, 2006 <br /> <br />1. Presentation by Connie Woodhouse, Tree Rings and Past Flows on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />2. IBCC Report: New IBCC subcommittees were created: (1) Needs Assessment Work Group to <br />study instream flows and water quality; (2) Education and Outreach: How to get public input <br />back to the IBCC, so that special interest groups do not dominate; and (3) Water Supply Reserve <br />Account Guidelines to determine how to allocate SB-179 grant money. <br /> <br />3. Changes to the SB 179 Grant Guidelines were discussed and agreed upon to forward to the IBCC <br />and CWCB. <br /> <br />September 25,2006 <br /> <br />1. CBRT Bylaws were approved, and the officer slate was re-elected, with no change from the prior <br />year to either the bylaws or the officer slate. <br /> <br />2. Subcommittees met to determine potential Water Supply Reserve Account grant applications. <br /> <br />4. Stan Cazier recommended that a representative from XCEL energy come to the November <br />CBR T meeting to discuss Shoshone power plant operations, and that the CBR T discuss drafting <br />the letter and meeting with Denver after that discussion. Ken Neubecker seconded the motion, <br />and it passed unanimously. <br /> <br />October 23,2006 <br /> <br />1. The CBRT report to the legislature for 2005-06 was edited, with changes stressing that the <br />CBR T believes SWSI inadequately addressed consumptive and nonconsumptive needs <br />assessment and, in particular, failed to address energy development's impact on water supply and <br />availability. <br /> <br />2. CDM (Camp Dresser McKee) was introduced as the engineering firm charged with performing <br />the needs assessment. <br /> <br />3. Group broke out into consumptive and nonconsumptive groups to discuss SB 179 and HB 1400 <br />grant requests, and decided to prioritize these at the November 2006 meeting. <br /> <br />4. No motions were voted upon. However, the CBRT members discussed and stated its strong <br />belief that a basin wide needs assessment is needed. <br /> <br />L\CWCB Imaging\Caleb\Minutes\Colorado\2007\Minutes Feb 2007 CBRTdoc <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />7/l< <br />