My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado 1-23-06 Minutes
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
Colorado 1-23-06 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:14:28 PM
Creation date
7/10/2007 2:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Title
Minutes
Date
1/23/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Firm up Windy Gap - build a reservoir on eastern slope at Chimney Hollow. <br />This will be tough. <br /> <br />Denver firming projects: Denver wants western slope support for its firming projects. <br /> <br />Must have substantial agreement with Denver before their firming project can take <br />place. <br />Grand County believes it has 1041 powers over the Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District. <br /> <br />How can IBCC Roundtable process affect Denver's dili2ence application? <br /> <br />Stan Cazier <br /> <br />We do not know. <br />We have timing problems. <br />Green Mountain pumpback will take six to nine months. <br /> <br />What Denver does impacts what the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District will do. <br /> <br />Denver has the water it needs for the City and County of Denver, but none for Aurora, Douglas, <br />Adams, and Jefferson counties. The far reaching problem is Douglas County because they are <br />building houses on a non-renewable supply of water (i.e., the aquifer). <br /> <br />The Denver Water Board has made no decision on whether their water facilities (dams and <br />tunnels) will serve the communities south of Denver. But since the infrastructure is in place, they <br />expect pressure by southern Denver Metro counties to use it. <br /> <br />Issue: Other Front Range stakeholders haven't been brought into the process. <br /> <br />Denver has a permit application for a project in Grand County. <br /> <br />Louis Mever: Are Garfield and Pitkin counties being represented in these meetings in <br />addition to Summit and Grand Counties? <br /> <br />Is the agreement just between Garfield and Pitkin and Denver, or will agreement also involve <br />Douglas, Aurora and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District with separate <br />agreement between Summit and Grand counties and Denver? <br /> <br />Decision is pending in next 18 months on Denver's Grand County application. EIS deadline is <br />due June 4, 2006, from the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />Lurline Curran: The interests of Grand County and the Grand Valley citizen's group are almost <br />identical. <br /> <br />Rick Sackbauer: Eagle County Water and Sanitation District had regular problems with the <br /> <br />L\CWCB Imaging\Caleb\Minutes\Colorado\2006\Colorado 1-23-06 Minutes.doc <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.