My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Minutes Nov 2006 CBRT
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
Colorado Minutes Nov 2006 CBRT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:14:34 PM
Creation date
7/10/2007 2:22:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Title
Minutes
Date
11/27/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3. The roundtable discussed recommendations to the CWCB for how to allocate the SB 179 <br />$10 million grants. <br /> <br />4. The roundtable unanimously agreed to revise the June 2006 resolution to recommend that <br />the Grand Junction Bureau of Reclamation office manage Green Mountain Reservoir. <br />The revised resolution recommends that the reservoir be managed by an unprejudiced <br />agency in a fair and impartial manner. <br /> <br />August 26. 2006 <br /> <br />1. Presentation by Connie Woodhouse, Tree Rings and Past Flows on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />2. IBCC Report: New IBCC subcommittees were created: (1) Needs Assessment Work <br />Group to study instream flows and water quality; (2) Education and Outreach: How to <br />get public input back to the IBCC, so that special interest groups do not dominate; and (3) <br />Water Supply Reserve Account Guidelines to determine how to allocate SB-179 grant <br />money. <br /> <br />3. Changes to the SB 179 Grant Guidelines were discussed and agreed upon to forward to <br />the IBCC and CWCB. <br /> <br />September 25.2006 <br /> <br />1. CBR T Bylaws were approved, and the officer slate was re-elected, with no change fi'om <br />the prior year to either the bylaws or the officer slate. <br /> <br />2. Subcommittees met to determine potential Water Supply Reserve Account grant <br />app lications. <br /> <br />4. Stan Cazier recommended that a representative fi'om XCEL energy come to the <br />November CBRT meeting to discuss Shoshone power plant operations, and that the <br />CBR T discuss drafting the letter and meeting with Denver after that discussion. Ken <br />Neubecker seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously. <br /> <br />October 23. 2006 <br /> <br />1. The CBRT report to the legislature for 2005-06 was edited, with changes stressing that <br />the CBRT believes SWSI inadequately addressed consumptive and nonconsumptive <br />needs assessment and, in particular, failed to address energy development's impact on <br />water supply and availability. <br /> <br />2. CDM (Camp Dresser McKee) was introduced as the engineering firm charged with <br />performing the needs assessment. <br /> <br />3. Group broke out into consumptive and nonconsumptive groups to discuss SB 179 and <br />HB 1400 grant requests, and decided to prioritize these at the November 2006 meeting. <br /> <br />L\CWCB Imaging\Caleb\Minutes\Colorado\2006\Colorado Minutes Nov 2006 CBRT.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.