Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />Task 1 Results - Orchard Mesa Power Canal enlargement study <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Section 4 - Open Earthen Canal 50+00 to 57+87. No plans were found for this portion <br />of ditch. However, during a field visit the canal was observed flowing at a flow rate of <br />approximately 800 cfs. Freeboard along much of this section of canal was observed in <br />excess of 3 ft. In order to increase the capacity of this ditch from 800 cfs to 860 cfs, little <br />work will need to be done. For the purposes of cost estimation, it was assumed that <br />some fill would be required in low spots. <br /> <br />Section 5 - Mann Gulch Siphon 57+87 to 59+40. The existing Mann Gulch siphon is <br />designed to convey a flow rate of 800 cfs. In order to increase the capacity of this <br />structure, the inlet and outlet works would need to be raised by about 1.5 ft. <br /> <br />Section 6 - Open Earthen Canal 59+40 to 72+50. No plans were found for this portion <br />of canal. During a field visit, this section of canal was observed flowing at a flow rate of <br />800 cfs. Freeboard along the canal was observed in excess of 3 ft in many places. <br />There was also a bridge crossing along this section of canal. The bridge's low girder <br />elevation was at least 2-ft above the water surface. This section on canal will likely <br />require little, if any, modification to handle an additional 60 cfs of flow. For cost <br />estimation purposes, it was assumed some fill would need to be imported and placed <br />along some sections of the existing canal. <br /> <br />Section 7 - Stokes Gulch Siphon 72+50 to 74+16. The existing Stokes Gulch siphon is <br />designed to convey a flow rate of 800 cfs. The capacity of this structure could be <br />increased to 860 cfs by increasing the top elevations of the inlet and outlet works by <br />about 1.5 ft. <br /> <br />Section 8 - Flume Section 74+16 to 78+50. The existing flume, similar to the flume <br />immediately downstream of the Colorado Siphon, has a capacity of 812 cfs. The flume <br />was observed in the field, operating at a flow rate of approximately 800 cfs. The average <br />freeboard was about 1 ft. The tops of the concrete walls on the existing flume would <br />need to be raised in elevation by 1.5 ft to account for extra depth in the flume caused by <br />the increased flow rate. <br /> <br />Section 9 - Cut and Cover Conduit 78+50 to 93+50. The Cut and Cover Conduit is an <br />11' wide by 11'-4" deep box conduit. It has a design flow rate of 800 cfs. Under the <br />design flow rate of 800 cfs, the box flows at a depth of 10ft 4 in. If the flow rate was <br />increased to 860 cfs, the conduit would operate very close to the maximum box conduit <br />depth of 11 ft 4 in, though it is considered that the existing conduit is likely adequate to <br />handle 860 cfs. The inlet and outlet top elevations will need to be raised by 1 to 1.5 ft in <br />elevation to prevent overtopping. <br /> <br />Section 10- Flume Section 93+50 to 97+71. The existing flume has the same geometry <br />and design flow rate as does Section 8. The design flow rate is 800 cfs. Under the <br />design flow rate, the canal runs with an average of about 1 ft of freeboard. In order to <br />increase the capacity of the flume to 860 cfs, the tops of the concrete flume walls would <br />need to be increased by 1 ft. A small bridge also exists along this section of canal, and it <br />may need to be modified slightly to make room for the higher canal walls. <br /> <br />2616-R1 <br /> <br />Orchard Mesa Irrigation District <br /> <br />Water Management Consultants <br />