Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />TASK 1 RESULTS <br />ENLARGEMENT STUDY <br /> <br />ORCHARD MESA POWER CANAL <br /> <br />2.1 Costs of increasing power canal capacity to 860 cfs <br /> <br />The total cost of increasing the capacity of the Orchard Mesa Power Canal was <br />determined by breaking into sections the entire Colorado River to Government Highline <br />Canal to Orchard Mesa Power Canal to Colorado River conveyance system. In order for <br />the system to operate at an increased capacity, every section of the system must be <br />capable of handling the increased flow rates. The overall conveyance system was <br />broken down into 14 parts. These parts were analyzed separately and estimated costs <br />were attached to each part based upon required improvements. A description of the 14 <br />different sections and the required improvements for each section follows (note that the <br />stationing is approximate only): <br /> <br />Section 1 - Grand Valley Diversion Dam and Government Highline Canal above the <br />Colorado River Siphon. This portion of the project was designed to handle a flow rate of <br />1,675 cfs. Under current conditions, this canal must convey 730 cfs to the Grand Valley <br />Water Users Association (GVWUA), 800 cfs to the Orchard Mesa Power Canal, 80 cfs to <br />Palisade, and 40 cfs to Mesa County, or a total of 1,650 cfs. In order to deliver 860 cfs to <br />the Orchard Mesa Power Canal, the total capacity of the Government Highline Canal <br />would need to be increased by 35 cfs, to 1,710 cfs. For the purposes of this study, it has <br />been assumed that the canal can safely convey this additional flow. <br /> <br />Section 2 - Colorado River Siphon. The existing Colorado River Siphon is designed to <br />handle a flow rate of 800 cfs. In order to increase the capacity by 60 cfs to 860 cfs, the <br />inlet side of the siphon would need to have an increase in water-surface elevation of <br />1-1.5 ft, which could be achieved by placing additional fill and concrete around the inlet <br />works. <br /> <br />Section 3 - Flume Section 6+97 to 50+00. The existing flume is designed to handle a <br />flow rate of 812 cfs. During field observations, the flume was observed flowing at <br />approximately 800 cfs. At this flow rate, the flume was operating with 0.5 ft to 1.5 ft of <br />channel freeboard. In order to convey 860 cfs, the top of the concrete elevation of this <br />flume would need to be raised by approximately 1.0 ft. <br /> <br />2616-R1 <br /> <br />Orchard Mesa Irrigation District <br /> <br />Water Management Consultants <br />