Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I ntrod uction <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to identify and examine short-term and long-term <br />opportunities for canal modernization under the Union Ditch. This work has been <br />compiled through various elements of work with the Union Ditch Company (Union), <br />including several site visits, a f1yover of the canal, and discussions with the Union Ditch <br />Board of Directors. <br /> <br />One element of canal modernization that is discussed thoroughly in this study is the <br />concept of secondary supply. The relevance of secondary supply in Colorado is explored <br />in detail in the 2003 "Dual Systems Study," which was funded by the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board and conducted by Colorado State University1. This study included a <br />comprehensive examination of dual or secondary water supply systems that exist in <br />other states. Within the context of the study, dual systems in Utah, in particular, were <br />deemed to be quite suitable and desirable to the northern Colorado circumstance; <br />especially considering the water rights, the historic role of the canal companies, and the <br />growing pressures and impacts of urbanization. As urbanization increases in the vicinity <br />of the Union Ditch, there may be potential for the development of a secondary supply <br />system. This study conceptualizes key components of a potential secondary supply <br />system within the Union Ditch. <br /> <br />Development of a secondary water system is envisioned to be, not only a key canal <br />modernization strategy, but a mechanism for actually sustaining an agricultural economy <br />and setting amidst increased growth and competition for water. The potential for <br />urbanization within Union Ditch is high, although it is likely that traditional agricultural will <br />remain a part of the system for some time. As such, secondary supply has been <br />identified as a key, long-term element of this canal modernization study. More short-term <br />canal modernization opportunities are also discussed. <br /> <br />Description of Study Area <br /> <br />The Union Ditch Company is a mutual ditch company located in Weld County, Colorado. <br />Union operates and manages the Union Ditch for the benefit of the shareholders in the <br />company by providing direct flow irrigation water to a 5,500-acre service area. Figure 1 is a <br />general location map of the Union Ditch. The irrigated area within the Union Ditch and <br />the South Branch (a lateral that is a part of the Union Ditch) exists almost exclusively in <br />the lower half of the canal. A majority of the land under the Union Ditch is still in <br />agricultural production, even though urbanization pressures from surrounding cities are <br />increasing. <br /> <br />1 Wilkins-Wells, John and Terence H. Podmore. 2003. The Benefits and Costs of Pressurized <br />Dual Water Systems in Colorado and the Potential Role of Canal Companies and Irrigation <br />Districts in Providing the Pressurized Irrigation Water Supply Portion of the Dual Systems. <br />Report prepared by the Sociology Water Lab and the Colorado Institute for Irrigation <br />Management. Colorado State University, Fort Collins. September. <br />http://waterlab.colostate.edu/DuaIStudy/finished _ dualstudy.pdf <br /> <br />Aqua Engineering, Inc. <br />November 17,2004 <br /> <br />Canal Modernization Study <br />- 1 - <br />