Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />secondary water systems are installed in phases and some upsizing of pipe may be <br />required to accommodate future project phasing. <br /> <br />The irrigation pump stations must be designed to provide consistent pressure over a <br />wide variation in flow. Pump stations with variable frequency drives (also know as VFD <br />pumps) are typically utilized because of the operational flexibility that VFD stations <br />afford. <br /> <br />A typical system pumping water from a storage pond will include a pond intake screen, <br />intake pipe, wet well, multi-pump prefabricated pump station, and automatic self- <br />cleaning filter. Generally, a two or three pump system is adequate. However, three or <br />four main pumps are provided on large secondary water systems, or where redundant <br />pumps are required to meet specific owner requirements or to ensure adequate backup <br />in case of pump failure or to take a pump off line for minor repairs. <br /> <br />Where possible, the existing diversion structure and headgate that has historically been <br />in place to control the delivery of water for agricultural use can be maintained and kept in <br />place for the secondary water system as well. However, frequently the existing diversion <br />does not work with the site layout and grading. In these instances, a new diversion <br />structure, headgate, flow measurement structure, and diversion ditch or pipe may be <br />required. In some cases, pumps are required to lift water from the diversion structure to <br />a storage pond. The lift pumps must be capable of diverting water to the storage pond <br />within the constraints imposed by the ditch company. For example, the lift pumps may <br />have to be designed to pump at the same delivery flow rate that historically was used <br />with the gravity diversion system. <br /> <br />Socio-Economic Considerations <br /> <br />The percentage of the population not earning an income through employment may be a <br />consideration when it comes to establishing initial water rates for the secondary system. <br />The bottom line would appear to be that, given the above (Table 1) and other socio- <br />economic characteristics of Lamar discussed below, the combined rate of potable and <br />secondary water service should not exceed the current cost of potable water use (Le., <br />for both indoor and outdoor use) borne by community residents. <br /> <br />Ideally, the combined rate for potable and secondary water should be initiated at a <br />degree less than the current cost of potable water. This would ensure that any of the <br />socio-economic characteristics mentioned for Lamar that could conceivably contribute to <br />a lack of success in the project would be minimized. Some comments are made in a <br />later section regarding how the project might be phased in to minimize the impact on <br />residents having fixed income, or income significantly below the median. <br /> <br />Many rural communities in the Rocky Mountain region are beginning to grow after <br />several years of population decline. The City of Lamar would appear to be no exception. <br />The City of Lamar has excellent potential for growth, since it is located at the intersection <br />of two important interstate transportation arteries. It has good schools, including one of <br />the few community colleges in the High Plains. <br /> <br />An important question to ask is whether or not the development of a secondary water <br />system for Lamar represents an affordable endeavor. All capital improvements for a <br />Aqua Engineering, Inc. <br />and Colorado State University Secondary Supply Feasibility Study <br />May 19, 2004 -5- <br />