Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />By contrast, a secondary water system for a typical 80-acre housing development, or a <br />whole community, may have 200 to 400 individual lots, in addition to common open <br />space areas. These systems must be designed to accommodate 200 to 400 individual <br />water managers, most of whom are homeowners who have little or no experience in <br />operating or managing irrigation systems. <br /> <br />One way to design and manage a secondary system for subdivisions is to impose tight <br />irrigation watering windows for each lot. For example, group 1 lots would only be allowed <br />to irrigate between the hours of 10 pm and 1 am, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. <br />Group 2 lots would be allowed to operate between 1 am and 4 am Monday, Wednesday, <br />and Friday, and so on. While this approach to system design can reduce the installation <br />cost of the secondary water system and maximize pump station operating efficiency, it is <br />generally difficult to manage and may impose overly restrictive conditions on <br />homeowners. <br /> <br />What often happens is that watering restrictions in subdivision covenants are not clearly <br />indicated to new homeowners by real estate agents, builders, or original homeowners <br />when they sell the home. Over time, the rules and order can break down leading to <br />overall homeowner dissatisfaction with the secondary water system. Irrigation systems <br />that require users to follow very narrow operating parameters are generally only <br />successful when there are a small number of lots or customers, such as in estate lot <br />residential development with a very strong and active homeowner's association in place. <br /> <br />Another approach is to design the secondary system based on lawn watering restrictions <br />commonly imposed by potable water purveyors when potable water is used for irrigation. <br />In Colorado, it is common to encourage homeowners to irrigate every other day, or every <br />third day during a drought. Using this as a basis for design, the pressurized secondary <br />water system would be designed to allow between one-half and one-third of the lots to <br />irrigate on any given day. <br /> <br />Figure 9 and 10 show a typical point of connection detail for a raw water connection at a <br />residential lot or at other discrete open space areas such as parks or streetscapes. It is <br />common to limit the flow from an individual residential tap to 10 GPM, the typical flow <br />allowed by systems using potable water under a typical 5/8" or %" water meter. Sizing a <br />secondary water system to allow the simultaneous operation of half of all irrigation <br />services in a typical development consisting of 7 ,000 square foot lots is very <br />conservative, and generally results in excessive pump station capacity and distribution <br />pipe sizing <br /> <br />Whichever method is used for estimating peak flow, the pump station and distribution <br />system must be sized to accommodate the peak flow. Hydraulic network analysis <br />software is very useful in analyzing pipe sizing for secondary systems. Typically, the <br />distribution pipe is sized to keep velocities below 5 feet per second. In many instances <br /> <br />3 It is interesting to note that a larger 1-inch tap and somewhat higher flow rate of 20 GPM is <br />desirable for the homeowner because system cost is less due to fewer valves, less wiring, and a <br />smaller controller. Taken together the cost of the irrigation system can be substantially less for a <br />larger available flow. <br />Aqua Engineering, Inc. <br />and Colorado State University Secondary Supply Feasibility Study <br />May 19, 2004 -4- <br />