My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00179 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00179 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:28 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:39:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/23/2007
Description
Director's Report - CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Measurements show groundwater Ieve~s continued to drop in 2006: <br />Groundwater levels in central and western Kansas continued to decline in 2006, <br />according to measurements made by the K.Jsas Geological Survey, based at the <br />University of Kansas, and the Division of W~ter Resources of the Kansas Department of <br />Agriculture. i <br /> <br />While water levels continued a trend of decl~e in western Kansas, the water levels in <br />, <br /> <br />central Kansas saw renewed decline after hol~iing steady just the year before. Strong <br />winter storms that hit western Kansas hampe'red data collection this year. <br />I <br />Preliminary data from western Kansas wells, most of them in the Ogallala aquifer, <br />showed an average decline of about 0.94 feet since January 2006, compared to an <br />average decline of about 0.57 feet in 2005. Bedluse of the weather delay and missed <br />I <br />wells, however, a meaningful comparison be~een 2005 and 2006 may not be available <br />until next year. I <br />I <br /> <br />Water levels in central Kansas were lower than! previous years, according to the <br />measurements. The Equus Beds area north of\fichita and Big Bend region of central <br />Kansas showed a drop of about 2.17 feet and 1.:29 feet, respectively, since January 2006. <br />This compares to a 0.03-foot increase and a O. 1 iI-foot decrease the year before. <br />I <br />I <br />The 2006 water level data are considered preliminary and are subject to additional study <br />and revision. The 2006 measurements can be vi~wed and accessed online at <br />http://www.kgs.ku.edulMagellanlWaterLevels/ihdex.html. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />Break in Fountain Creek Embankment Inu;ndates 50 Acre Area of Pueblo: On <br />the morning of Monday, May 8th, a 200-foot sectton of embankment was breached, <br />causing a 50 acre basin within the City of Pueblq to fill with water from Fountain Creek <br />flood flows. According to local residents, this e~bankment has operated as a de facto <br />"levee" protecting this basin for many years. As! of the time of this writing, many factors <br />are still being investigated, including what caused the failure, and the purpose, history, <br />and ownership of the embankment. According tb Dennis Maroney, Stormwater Utility <br />Director for the City of Pueblo, the cause of the flpod was a sudden shift of the Fountain <br />Creek channel which caused flows to attack the eh1bankment, weakening it to the point <br />of failure. Maroney stated to CWCB staff that w~ile the embankment may have been <br />providing some incidental protection, it has never been relied on by City staff to <br />function as a levee during flood flows. I <br /> <br />Initial reports indicate an approximate flow in F01;mtain Creek at the time of failure to be <br />I <br />4,500 cubic feet per second. This is elevated relatiye to the average flow for this time of <br />I <br />year, but is nowhere near floodstage for the waterWay. For comparison; the Flood <br />. I. <br />I <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.