Laserfiche WebLink
Key Findings Regarding M&I Gap Analysis <br />South Platte Basin 2030 demands <br />• Most M&I provides indicate they can meet demands with <br />existing supplies, projects underway, and future plans and <br />projects <br />• Most providers are pursuing enlargements of existing <br />reservoirs and new storage and consider those actions <br />critical to meeting future needs <br />• Reuse is being pursued by almost all cities that have <br />reliable reusable supplies <br />• Conservation is part of most providers’ plans, most <br />providers do not foresee or propose severe limitations on <br />outdoor water use <br />• Agricultural transfers will continue from purchases, <br />developer donations and development of irrigated lands <br />13 <br />Gravel Lake Storage <br />below Denver for <br />recapture of return flows <br />M&I Providers constructing <br />storage <br />Planned Gravel Lakes <br />Arvada <br />• <br />Aurora <br />• <br />Brighton <br />• <br />Central Colorado <br />• <br />Water Conservancy <br />District <br />Consolidated Mutual <br />• <br />Water Company <br />Denver Water <br />• <br />South Adams WSD <br />• <br />Thornton <br />• <br />Westminster <br />• <br />United WSD <br />• <br />Existing Gravel Lakes <br />Denver Metro WW Outfall <br />14 <br />7 <br />