Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> Table 2: Comparison to FEMA Results <br /> 100- YEAR FLOOD FLOWS MINNESOTA CREEK <br />Cross Distance Distance CWSE CWSE Difference <br />Section Study FEMA Study FEMA In CWSE <br />No. <br />0 0 8401 5719.8 5722 2.2 <br />1 1229 9630 5753,0 5755.5 2,5 <br />2 2141 10542 5764,1 5769 4,9 <br />3 3039 11440 5788,8 5791 2,2 <br /> <br />Our study used field survey for all cross-section data while the FEMA study used aerial <br />contour data with 4-foot intervals which may explain the differences presented above, <br />Also, the FEMA study was initiated in 1979 and the differences represented in our study <br />may be due to channel changes over time, <br /> <br />4 <br />