|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />7.0 RESULTS
<br />
<br />The HECRAS model results are attached to this report along with stream profiles and
<br />associated mapping, A summary of the results using a flood flow of 1345-cfs is shown in
<br />Table 1. Comparison with the FEMA study is shown in Table 2,
<br />
<br /> Table 1: Results
<br /> 100-YEAR FLOOD FLOWS MINNESOTA CREEK
<br />Cross Distance Distance Top Area Velocity Depth CWSE
<br />Section No. [1] [2] Width SF Ft/s Ft.
<br /> Ct
<br />0 0 8401 27,3 87,8 18,5 4.5 5719,8
<br />1 1229 9630 73,7 285,5 16.1 5.7 5753,0
<br />2 2141 10542 30,3 110.3 20,6 6,8 5764,1
<br />3 r31 3039 11440 271.4 308,8 15.2 4,5 5788,8
<br />4 3693 12094 147,6 312,8 14,5 5.5 5800,8
<br />5 4618 13019 40.6 124.7 16,7 5,1 5810.4
<br />6 4983 13384 43,7 183.4 14.7 7.3 5819.6
<br />6A culvert 1 5092 13493 171.1 745,5 8,2 7,8 5823,3
<br />6B 5135 13536 144.8 593.9 9.5 10.4 5826,1
<br />7 5259 13660 135,6 489,7 11.3 10,1 5826,2
<br />8 6061 14462 77.4 275.9 14,9 6,1 5834.4
<br />9 6852 15253 42.2 125,9 21.6 5,5 5841.8
<br />9A 6927 15328 15.5 96,7 14.2 7,6 5847,6
<br />9B 6969 15370 227.6 721.9 4,0 7,5 5853,5
<br />10 7103 15502 316.4 1173,5 7,0 10,2 5853,5
<br />11 8258 16659 72,2 242,0 13.9 6,9 5863.2
<br />12 9522 17923 30.3 117,3 16,8 5.4 5877,7
<br />13 10197 18598 34.3 129,5 16.6 5,9 5889.2
<br />14 11247 19648 457,0 627.4 19,7 6.6 5907,9
<br />15 12647 21048 33,5 175,9 12.5 7,7 5923,0
<br />16 13123 21524 44,0 108.3 18,0 3.8 5926.1
<br />17 13881 22282 233,0 444.7 24.4 8,2 5953,0
<br />18 14452 22853 151.5 328,8 13,5 5.1 5961.4
<br />19 16357 24758 34,7 158.0 38,0 8,6 5976,9
<br />19A 16847 25248 17.1 99.9 13,8 7,5 6011.3
<br />19B 16892 25293 180,0 640,9 5,8 12,6 6018,9
<br />20 17135 25536 350,2 2352.3 1.9 ' 12.0 6019.4
<br />21 17840 26241 86,8 262.2 12,2 5,2 6018,8
<br />
<br />[1] Feet upstream from beginning of study
<br />[2] Feet upstream from mouth (from FEMA 1991 study)
<br />[3] Section 3 is in close proximity to section M in 1991 FEMA study
<br />
<br />3
<br />
|