My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
30
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:31 PM
Creation date
6/26/2007 9:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/2004
Description
WSP Section - Navajo Nation Federal Reserved Water Right Settlement with the State of New Mexico
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Agenda Item 29 <br />January 27-28, 2004 Board Meeting <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />agreement and may have additional claims that would have to be "offset" by corresponding <br />reductions in use by the Navajo Nation. <br />2. Under the settlement agreement, the Navajo Nation would administer rights on Navajo Lands <br />subject to non-impairment of non-Navajo water rights. We are concerned that if this clause is <br />not tightly written, that it could open up interstate water marketing, given that Navajo lands are <br />located in several states. The fact that transfers of water by the Navajo Nation to non-Navajo <br />lands are subject to approval by the New Mexico State Engineer lends some comfort, but may <br />not be adequate to avoid the issue and uphold the integrity of the compact. <br />3. The increased use of water and additional water development in the Little Colorado River (LCR) <br />could adversely impact the population of Humpback: Chub (HBC) in the LCR. No mention of <br />HBC in the LCR is noted in the documents that I can see. We feel that it would be appropriate to <br />at least acknowledge this fact. As we have discussed during the Glen Canyon Adaptive <br />Management Program, a recovery program for the Colorado River and its tributaries between <br />Glen Canyon Dam and the high water line on Lake Mead would be a good thing and this may be <br />a good opportunity to help establish such a program given that the HBC population in the LCR is <br />pivotal to recovery. <br />4. We are aware that the Ute Tribes have some lands in New Mexico and this settlement may <br />foreclose development potential on those lands. Much as Navajo's derived some considerations <br />for lands that could be serviced by the Animas-La Plata Project, the Colorado Ute Tribes may <br />deserve similar consideration in this settlement process. <br />5. Given the comments New Mexico, Navajo's and Jicarilla provided on Long Hollow Reservoir, <br />we should respond in kind that this settlement could also impact federal trust responsibilities to <br />Ute tribal lands. <br /> <br />Conclusion and Recommendation <br /> <br />We suggest that the above comments be forwarded to federal agencies, New Mexico and tribal <br />interests in the San Juan basin. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.