Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Randy Seaholm, Chief, Water Supply Protection <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />January 19,2004 <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Agenda Item 30, January 27-28 Board Meeting <br />Water Supply Protection, Navajo Nation Federal Reserved Water Right <br />Settlement with the State of New Mexico <br /> <br />Back2round <br /> <br />Attached hereto is the draft Executive Summary (ES) of the "San Juan River Basin in New Mexico, <br />Navajo Water Right Settlement." Rather than attempt to summarize the settlement with its extensive <br />qualifications, I have elected to let the summary speak for itself. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />New Mexico did not provide Colorado with any notification that the settlement documents were <br />available for review and comment. Rather we learned a couple weeks after the fact that they were <br />posted on the New Mexico State Engineers website. Colorado ask:ed for an extension of time to <br />comment given the late notice and the fact that comments were requested over the holidays. New <br />Mexico stated that they were not obligated to request comments, but indicated that they would <br />accept comments after the January 15th deadline, but could not provide any assurance that the <br />comments would be fully considered. <br /> <br />Staff in reviewing the documents has the following concerns: <br /> <br />1. Does the settlement actually k:eep New Mexico within its compact apportionment under the <br />current "Hydrologic Determination"? The settlement agreements claim to accomplish this, but <br />New Mexico is advancing a depletion schedule that assumes that 5% of the irrigated land is <br />fallow at any given point in time. If this does not occur, New Mexico would rely on certain <br />subordination clauses in the settlement to remain within their compact apportionment. <br />Accounting details on how this would be done have not yet been work:ed out and disclosed. This <br />concern is compounded by the statement on page 4 of the ES that indicates individual members <br />of the Navajo Nation that have been allotted land by the U.S. are not bound by the settlement <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />