Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 5 <br />Consumptive Water Needs in the North Platte Basin <br /> <br />Table 5-8 Current and Range of Potential 2030 Agricultural Demands (AFY) <br /> <br />Basin <br /> <br />Irrigated Acres <br /> <br />Irrigation Water <br />Requirement (IWR) <br /> <br />, P uQf!1Jt: <br />Arkansas <br />Colorqdo <br />Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />IGunnison <br />North Platte <br />Rio Grande <br />South Platte <br />~~afVVhite/Green <br />STATE TOTAL <br />2030 Projections: <br />Arkansas <br />Colorado <br />Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />Gunnison <br />North Platte <br />Rio Grande <br />South Plqtte <br />~~afVVhite/Green <br />STATE TOTAL <br /> <br />Water Supply <br />Limited (WSL <br /> <br />Incidental Losses + <br />Stock Pond <br />Evaporation <br /> <br />Gross Diversions <br /> <br />405,000 748,000 619,000 69,000 <br />238,000 366,000 319,000 36,000 <br />255,000 370,000 294,000 33,000 <br />I 264,000 I 473,000 I 396,000 I 44,000 <br />116000 96000 96000 11 000 <br />633,000 1,108,000 776,000 87,000 <br />1,027,000 1 }98,000 1,541,000 173,000 <br />118,000 138,000 123,000 14,000 <br />3,056,000 5,097,000 I 4,164,000 I 467,000 I <br /> <br />333~OOO-38[OOO~616~OOO~707 ~OOO~ 5To~oOO~584,06o 57 ~o-oo--=65~o6o <br />222,000~230,000 -1--342,000~354,000 -1--298,000~309 ,000 -1---33,000-=- 35,000 <br />252~660~259~O'OO-1---36Koo-0~37fo-o'O-1---292~OOO~296~O'OO-r--33~0-OO-=-3fo'oo <br />254,000,261,000 455,000,468,000 381,000,392,000 43,000 - 44,000 <br />116000 116000 96000 11000 <br />533,000,573,000 932,000,1.003,000 653,000,703,000 73.000,79,000 <br />801,000,894,000 1 A02,000,1.565,000 1,202,000,1.342,000 135,000,150,000 <br />116,000,158,000 135,000,183,000 120,000,163,000 13,000,18,000 <br />2,726,000-2,932,000 4,366,000-4,769,000 3,552,000-3,885,000 398,000-435,000 <br /> <br />1 }70,000 <br />1 }64,000 <br />953,00~_ <br />1 }05,000 <br />397 000 <br />1 ,660~QQQ.... <br />2,606,QQQ.... <br />642,000 <br />11,497,~ <br /> <br />-,.- -'-~ <br />1 A57,000~1,670,00~_ <br />1,644,000,1 }06,000 <br />948~0-0-0~962~0-0-0- <br />1,640,000,1,689,000 <br />397 000 <br />1,398,000,1,503,009 <br />2,033,000,2,269.000 <br />627,000'852,000 <br />10,144,000-11,048:000- <br /> <br />Second, the lack of available physical supply can also be <br />a factor that contributes to the calculation of water <br />shortage. For example, a ranch may irrigate hay <br />meadows from a number of small streams running <br />through the ranch. These small streams will normally dry <br />up in late summer, resulting in a lack of available supply <br />even though the water right may be in priority. Additional <br />water supplies could be put to beneficial use if water <br />were available. Shortages as a result of the priority of <br />water rights and the lack of physical supply could <br />potentially be reduced if additional storage were <br />developed to supplement existing supplies. <br /> <br />A third factor that contributes to water shortage <br />calculations results from irrigation practices. These <br />calculated shortages are attributable to farming <br />operational practices, where farmers choose to cease <br />irrigation before the end of the growing season. In other <br />words, the shortages are by choice rather than due to <br />water availability. For example, irrigation may cease for <br />the season in late July or early August, even though <br />water supplies may be available. This is to allow hay to <br />be cut, dried, and baled. The theoretical need for water <br />remains, and additional application of water would result <br />in additional CU. This type of water shortage cannot be <br />reduced through additional water supplies and has not <br />been further evaluated. <br /> <br />For the basins having DSS tools, water districts that <br />have significant water shortages resulting from the <br />relative priority of the water rights or lack of physical <br /> <br />S:\1177\BASIN REPORTS\NORTH PLATTElS5_NORTH PLATTE. DOC <br /> <br />supply have been identified. A more detailed description <br />of the methodology for evaluating these shortages can <br />be found in Appendix F of the SWSI Report Figure 5-10 <br />shows those basins that have been determined to have <br />significant water shortages as described above. Based <br />on the prevalence of calls throughout the entire Arkansas <br />Basin, even during average year streamflow conditions, <br />widespread agricultural water shortages can be <br />expected. <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />C3 Noo.DSS Bi1Sll1S wrthMiet!)atooj Vpj"'lPfo;)d A9'"lCUltlJfal WlItcf ~,. <br />. C,t.es C3 l/hler O,Strw:t WI11"1 A~e Agn(lJIII".al WA'.t;Il ShOrt~)o= 10% <br />c:3 V,'aler Dlsthd With A...eiage Agncultural Wa':eor Shot1ages '" 10'% <br />C3 RJ'J1!f B.a51rrS c:3 W.all1l1' Olstnet w~1\ PQ$sitMAgno.JIlUl'al W;:JII~ ~$ <br /> <br />::l "'--_ <br /> <br />Figure 5-10 <br />Summary of Agricultural Water Shortages by Water District <br /> <br />CONI <br /> <br />5-11 <br />