My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NorthPlatteBasinWaterSupplyandNeedsReport
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
NorthPlatteBasinWaterSupplyandNeedsReport
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 10:49:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
North Platte
Title
Water Supply & Needs Report for the North Platte Basin
Date
6/1/2006
Author
CDM
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Needs Assessment Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 5 <br />Consumptive Water Needs in the North Platte Basin <br />'.1111 <br /> <br /> <br />South Platte <br /> <br />Mansas <br /> <br />98,000 <br />38% <br /> <br />Figure 5-7 <br />Projected Increase in Combined Gross M&I <br />and 551 Demand (AFY) and Percent <br />Increase from 2000 to 2030 by Basin <br /> <br />Similar to the population patterns described earlier in this <br />section, rates of M&I water use increases over the <br />30-year planning period are generally higher for the West <br />Slope basins than for the Front Range. However, the <br />bulk of the increase in water uses in terms of AFY will be <br />in the South Platte and Arkansas Basins, which together <br />represent about 80 percent of the total projected <br />increase in Colorado's gross M&I and SSI demands. <br /> <br />High and low estimates were also developed around the <br />baseline M&I and SSI water use projections described <br />above. Results of the high and low analysis are <br />presented on a basin basis in Figure 5-8. These values <br />represent the range of demands that might be expected <br />to occur in each basin in 2030. Enhanced conservation <br /> <br />0 <br />(') 1,400,000 <br />0 <br />'" <br /><: 1,200,000 <br />'" <br />VI <br />:J 1,000,000 <br /> <br /> <br />:;; <br />~ 800,000 -------------------------------- <br />S[L <br />~ ::;. 600,000 <br />-g 400,000 <br />'" <br />Oii 200,000 <br />2: <br />VI <br />VI <br />o <br />(; <br /> <br />'iJ-&' boo ~ <br />~~ ~o<!i _*'~ <br />_If.' ~O ~' <br />yo' u- !1>~ <br />~Cj <br />..:,'>'6 <br />~ <br />~'6 <br />I.r$'i <br />~o <br /><:>0 <br /> <br />o~ ,,*,"0 <br />!$or:,; <l."'I> <br />,:><:' lS' <br />('; ~o <br /> <br />bo0 'l:f!' 0~ <br />r1.~<:' <l."'I> rj-flJ <br />v ;so ~ <br />4:>0 Cjo~' /' <br />4,#Q <br /> <br />Figure 5-8 <br />Range of Potential Gross M&I and 551 Water Use in 2030 <br /> <br />CONI <br /> <br />5-10 <br /> <br />efforts that could further reduce the "low" water use <br />projections were considered in the options evaluation <br />phase as described in Section 9. <br /> <br />5.3 Projected 2030 Agricultural <br />Demand <br /> <br />Projections of 2030 agricultural demands and supporting <br />data are presented in Table 5-8. As a result of the <br />estimated potential changes in irrigated acres, <br />agricultural demands and their associated gross <br />diversions are shown as decreasing in the Arkansas, <br />Colorado, Gunnison Rio Grande, and South Platte <br />Basins. Demands in the Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />and Yampa/ White Green Basins may have a net <br />increase if additional agricultural supplies are developed <br />to provide for the increase in irrigated acres. <br /> <br />A summary of total projected Colorado agricultural use <br />relative to M&I and SSI demands is shown in Figure 5-9. <br />As can be seen, agricultural use is expected to still <br />comprise the majority of these uses in 2030. <br /> <br />2% <br /> <br />iii Agricultural <br />ID M&I <br />. SSI <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 5-9 <br />Relative Proportions of Agricultural, M&I, <br />and 551 Water Use in 2030 <br /> <br />To better anticipate future conditions, it is helpful to <br />examine existing supply and demand. There are a <br />number of factors that impact the calculation of water <br />shortages such as the relative priority of water rights, the <br />physical supply of water available for diversion at any <br />given point, and irrigation practices. These factors are <br />discussed in greater detail below. First, under the <br />Colorado prior appropriation system, water is allocated <br />based on the priority of the water right, so that during <br />times of average to less than average streamflows, some <br />water rights will not be in priority, resulting in a shortage <br />of water to meet irrigation water requirements. <br /> <br />S:\1177\BASIN REPORTS\NORTH PLATTElS5_NORTH PLATTE. DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.