My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10617 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10617 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:39:54 PM
Creation date
5/18/2007 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder County and Incorporated Areas
Title
FIS - Boulder County and Incorporated Areas - Vol 1
Date
10/4/2002
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />May 16, 1957 - Boulder Daily Camera: <br /> <br />Nederland reservoir of the Public Service Company is now <br />half full, The Camera was informed today. Rumor had it <br />that water was spilling over the dam for the first time in <br />many years. Prospects are good for the reservoir filling <br />but not until later in the summer. <br /> <br />Meantime reservoirs in Boulder Valley are rapid filling <br />with flood water, and irrigation ditches (not those running <br />through Boulder) are carrying a full load to the reservoirs <br />they service. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />There were no structural flood protection measures at the time of <br />the initial study in Boulder County. Presently, Barker Reservoir <br />on Boulder Creek and Gross Reservoir on South Boulder Creek are far <br />enough upstream from the areas studied by detailed methods that <br />their flood protection effects are negligible. Since 1971, Boulder <br />County has undertaken an active program of floodplain management. <br /> <br />Past urbanization in the City of Boulder has encroached <br />drainageways and reduced stream storage, thereby increasing runoff <br />peaks and volumes. Undersized culverts and channels exist <br />throughout the city. A few measures have been taken to alleviate <br />these problems on some of the study streams and are discussed <br />below. This discussion excludes drainage improvements constructed <br />to provide protection from erosion. The degree to which the <br />flood-control measures discussed protect fram return interval <br />floods is unknown at this time. <br /> <br />Flood-protection measures along Wonderland Creek consist of <br />Wonderland Lake (Reference 21); the ponding area between Wonderland <br />Lake and Broadway; the channelization projects along the Winding <br />Trail Village and Aspen Grove developments, located between the <br />Longment Diagonal and 26th Street (Reference 22); the recently <br />constructed 26 Avenue Crossing culvert and drop inlet <br />(Reference 22); and the detention pond east of 47th Street <br />(Reference 23). Wonderland Lake, while not designed to provide <br />flood protection, will attenuate the 100-year peak floodflow fram <br />400 to 100 cfs. For the routing analysis, Wonderland Lake will be <br />considered filled to the spillway crest at the time of sto~ runoff <br />routing. The area between Wonderland Lake and Broadway creates an <br />unplanned flood-control structure, because the culvert at Broadway <br />will convey very little flow and a considerable ponding volume is <br />available. This unplanned flood reservoir was not included in the <br />hydrologic analysis. Diversion flow from Fou~le Canyon Creek to <br />the north will also reach Wonderland Creek at this location. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.